134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259438)
1. A response to OMB's comments regarding OSHA's approach to risk assessment in support of OSHA's final rule on cadmium.
Crump KS; Gentry R
Risk Anal; 1993 Oct; 13(5):487-9. PubMed ID: 8259438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High-risk occupations for women exposed to cadmium.
Freeman CS
J Occup Med; 1994 Aug; 36(8):902-5. PubMed ID: 7807273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who's in charge here? OSHA's/OMB's labeling standard.
Schechter D
Occup Health Saf; 1982 May; 51(5):21-5. PubMed ID: 7078916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments on "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard".
Cox GV
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 20(6):823-4. PubMed ID: 1805621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The watchdog has no teeth, and may be blind: comments on OSHA's use of TLVs.
Frank AL
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):686-7. PubMed ID: 2053586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. OSHA's final rule on asbestos cuts permissible exposure in half.
Okleshen W
Health Facil Manage; 1995 Jan; 8(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10139314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. EtO exposure: OSHA's new rule.
Cruzen S
Mich Hosp; 1984 Nov; 20(11):20-5. PubMed ID: 10268786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational exposure to ethylene oxide: OSHA's new proposed rule--a document whose time has come!
Samuels TM
Hosp Top; 1983; 61(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 10260131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: "OSHA's reliance on TLVs".
Lauwerys R
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):827. PubMed ID: 1882861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Updating OSHA's permissible exposure limits: putting politics aside.
Paustenbach DJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Dec; 58(12):845-9. PubMed ID: 9425644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Good ideas sorely needed on OSHA's PELs.
Laws J
Occup Health Saf; 2015 May; 84(5):4. PubMed ID: 26043468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard.
Myers JE
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):832-4. PubMed ID: 1882864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comment on "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard" by Robinson et al.
Saric M
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 1882859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A dose-response analysis and quantitative assessment of lung cancer risk and occupational cadmium exposure.
Stayner L; Smith R; Thun M; Schnorr T; Lemen R
Ann Epidemiol; 1992 May; 2(3):177-94. PubMed ID: 1342271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: OSHA's reliance on TLVs.
Hagglund G
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):691. PubMed ID: 2053588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Determinants of lung cancer risk among cadmium-exposed workers.
Lamm SH; Parkinson M; Anderson M; Taylor W
Ann Epidemiol; 1992 May; 2(3):195-211. PubMed ID: 1345214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing toxicologic and epidemiologic studies: methylene chloride--a case study.
Stayner LT; Bailer AJ
Risk Anal; 1993 Dec; 13(6):667-73. PubMed ID: 8310163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cadmium mortality assessment.
Kazantzis G
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 20(5):701-4. PubMed ID: 1793110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard": a comment.
Mendeloff J
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):681-3. PubMed ID: 2053584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clarification of Employer’s Continuing Obligation To Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness. Final rule.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor
Fed Regist; 2017 May; 82(84):20548-9. PubMed ID: 28497945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
