These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259499)

  • 21. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clearing away the junk: court-appointed experts, scientifically marginal evidence, and the silicone gel breast implant litigation.
    Goss PJ; Worthington DL; Stallard MJ; Price JM
    Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 12022195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethics expert testimony: against the skeptics.
    Agich GJ; Spielman BJ
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):381-403. PubMed ID: 9309551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Court ruling on 'junk science' gives judges more say about what expert witness testimony to allow.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):423. PubMed ID: 8320770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Science v. law. A decade-old rule on scientific evidence comes under fire.
    Brickley P
    Sci Am; 2003 Dec; 289(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 14631724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Veterinary medical associations, state government, and the courts.
    Hannah HW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1989 Aug; 195(3):322-3. PubMed ID: 2768055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A physician's obligation to the courts; the technique of being a good medical expert witness.
    SPALDING ED
    J Mich State Med Soc; 1954 Feb; 53(2):160-1; passim. PubMed ID: 13222032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On being ethical in legal places.
    Anderten P; Staulcup V; Grisso T
    Prof Psychol; 1980 Oct; 11(5):764-73. PubMed ID: 11650638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bioethics, expertise, and the courts: an overview and an argument for inevitability.
    Morreim EH
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 9309545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Supreme Court to weigh science.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):588-90. PubMed ID: 8338515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Science and law. Cell phone lawsuits face a scientific test.
    Parascandola M
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5546):1440-2. PubMed ID: 11711652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders in the courts.
    Shuman DW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 2706331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
    Giannelli PC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Courtroom science and standards of proof.
    Miller DR
    Lancet; 1987 Nov; 2(8570):1283-4. PubMed ID: 2890899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The medical witness and the courts.
    Schmalzbach OR; Listwan IA
    Med J Aust; 1968 Nov; 2(22):1017-8. PubMed ID: 5704492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The medical witness and the courts.
    Segelov PM
    Med J Aust; 1968 Dec; 2(26):1209. PubMed ID: 5704893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evolution of the American test for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Imwinkelried EJ
    Med Sci Law; 1990 Jan; 30(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2304400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.