BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259964)

  • 1. Characteristics of dean's letters in 1981 and 1992.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Scott CS; Chu J; Leiden LI
    Acad Med; 1993 Dec; 68(12):905-11. PubMed ID: 8259964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A follow-up study of the characteristics of dean's letters.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren C; Scott C; Marshall SG; Braddock CH; Sarfaty S
    Acad Med; 2001 Jul; 76(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 11448831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications.
    Leiden LI; Miller GD
    J Med Educ; 1986 Dec; 61(12):943-53. PubMed ID: 3783637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dishonest dean's letter: an analysis of 532 dean's letters from 99 U.S. medical schools.
    Edmond M; Roberson M; Hasan N
    Acad Med; 1999 Sep; 74(9):1033-5. PubMed ID: 10498099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between dean's letter rankings and later evaluations by residency program directors.
    Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Grady-Weliky TA
    Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17594220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A program director's guide to the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (former dean's letter) with a database.
    Naidich JB; Grimaldi GM; Lombardi P; Davis LP; Naidich JJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 24713497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical Student Performance Evaluations in 2005: an improvement over the former dean's letter?
    Shea JA; O'Grady E; Morrison G; Wagner BR; Morris JB
    Acad Med; 2008 Mar; 83(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 18316879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing assessments of medical students' potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Carline J
    Acad Med; 1991 Jun; 66(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 2069654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are Narrative Letters of Recommendation for Medical Students Interpreted as Intended by Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs?
    Egan CR; Dashe J; Hussein AI; Tornetta P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1679-1687. PubMed ID: 34252917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the final adjective in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation on determination of applicant desirability.
    Ward MA; Palazzi DL; Lorin MI; Agrawal A; Frankenthal H; Turner TL
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1542922. PubMed ID: 30406730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of self-estimated scholastic standing in residency selection.
    Sklar DP; Tandberg D
    J Emerg Med; 1995; 13(5):683-5. PubMed ID: 8530793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Profile of the graduate student population in U.S. medical schools.
    Ammons SW; Kelly DE
    Acad Med; 1997 Sep; 72(9):820-30. PubMed ID: 9311327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter.
    Wagoner NE; Suriano JR
    Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):688-9. PubMed ID: 2803435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An open letter to those who write dean's letters.
    Saper CB
    Ann Neurol; 2016 Dec; 80(6):795-796. PubMed ID: 27859512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship of medical students' admission interview scores to their dean's letter ratings.
    Hall FR; Regan-Smith M; Tivnan T
    Acad Med; 1992 Dec; 67(12):842-5. PubMed ID: 1457020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does medical school performance predict radiology resident performance?
    Boyse TD; Patterson SK; Cohan RH; Korobkin M; Fitzgerald JT; Oh MS; Gross BH; Quint DJ
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Apr; 9(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 11942658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poison pen letters, due process, and medical schools' policies toward anonymous correspondence that disparages medical school faculty.
    Paola FA; Malik TK; Walker RM
    Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):534-7. PubMed ID: 9609868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dean's letters.
    Robertson WO
    J Med Educ; 1987 Apr; 62(4):366-7. PubMed ID: 3560186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative performance information in the dean's letter.
    Curry RH; Yarnold PR; Wallace WH
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():24-9. PubMed ID: 3218863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of medical students: the dean's view.
    Lowe R
    Practitioner; 1980 Feb; 224(1340):169-71. PubMed ID: 7367370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.