These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8260008)

  • 1. Digital subtraction radiography for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 8260008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic parameters for the evaluation of peri-implant tissues.
    Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 1994 Feb; 4():87-97. PubMed ID: 9673197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Lang NP; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 1809671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital subtraction technique for evaluation of peri-implant bone change in digital dental imaging.
    Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Otonari T; Yamamoto M; Harada T; Sano T; Yajima Y; Ooguro T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2006 May; 47(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 17167221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction radiography: then (1983) and now (1998).
    Hausmann E
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 10065940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; Magnusson I; Johnson B; Meredith MP; Cavanaugh PF; Gerlach RW
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Apr; 31(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 8814584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
    Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
    Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissue changes.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Jun; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 7918909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subtraction radiography in oral implantology.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Jun; 17(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 9497714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometric alignment and chromatic calibration of serial radiographic images.
    Dornier C; Dorsaz-Brossa L; Thévenaz P; Casagni F; Brochut P; Mombelli A; Vallée J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 15533974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes.
    Griffiths GS; Brägger U; Fourmousis I; Sterne JA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 9446977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.