These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8260565)

  • 41. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing.
    Anourova I; Nikouline VV; Ilmoniemi RJ; Hotta J; Aronen HJ; Carlson S
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1268-77. PubMed ID: 11707083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of inter- and intramodal selective attention to non-spatial visual stimuli: an event-related potential analysis.
    de Ruiter MB; Kok A; van der Schoot M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Nov; 49(3):269-94. PubMed ID: 9858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Särkkä AK; Salmi J; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(12):3329-41. PubMed ID: 18598270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity.
    Teder W; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8416064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Alho K; Woods DL; Algazi A
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Sep; 31(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 7972601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction.
    Woldorff MG
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):98-119. PubMed ID: 8416067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans.
    Ortiz TA; Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1499-512. PubMed ID: 8509828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA; van Staveren AS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1660-71. PubMed ID: 11514249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
    Horváth J
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 23913121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. "Sensory gating" as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments.
    Eimer M
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jun; 55(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 8058454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An ERP Study of Response Inhibition in the Auditory Domain in Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.
    Gerhold MM; Jacobson SW; Jacobson JL; Molteno CD; Meintjes EM; Andrew CM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Jan; 41(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 27925227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Latency of auditory event-related potential P3 correlates with forward Digit Span in an Alaskan subarctic sample.
    Bush AM; Geist CR; Emery S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Jun; 72(3 Pt 1):820-2. PubMed ID: 1891320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sensory discrimination and its relationship to the cerebral processing of infrequent stimuli.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Mantle MM
    Can J Neurol Sci; 1987 Nov; 14(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 3690439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Auditory information processing in sleep: late cortical potentials in an oddball paradigm.
    Van Sweden B; Van Dijk JG; Caekebeke JF
    Neuropsychobiology; 1994; 29(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8022535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials.
    Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA; Röder B; Neville HJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 8(3):213-27. PubMed ID: 10556600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.
    Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16448629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials.
    Michie PT; Bearpark HM; Crawford JM; Glue LC
    Biol Psychol; 1990 Jun; 30(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 2282370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: an event-related potential study.
    Paavilainen P; Jiang D; Lavikainen J; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr; 35(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 8507743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.