These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8260620)

  • 21. Discrimination and categorization of speech and non-speech sounds in an MEG delayed-match-to-sample study.
    Luo H; Husain FT; Horwitz B; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 16023868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhanced early-latency electromagnetic activity in the left premotor cortex is associated with successful phonetic categorization.
    Alho J; Sato M; Sams M; Schwartz JL; Tiitinen H; Jääskeläinen IP
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):1937-46. PubMed ID: 22361165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changed categorical perception of consonant-vowel syllables induced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
    Heimrath K; Fischer A; Heinze HJ; Zaehle T
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 17():8. PubMed ID: 26831504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates.
    Dehaene-Lambertz G; Pena M
    Neuroreport; 2001 Oct; 12(14):3155-8. PubMed ID: 11568655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Palva S; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2000 Dec; 12(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 11112397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Latency variation of auditory N1m responses to vocal and nonvocal sounds.
    Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamasoba T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1945-9. PubMed ID: 18007192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Periodic glottal excitation and formant frequencies in the perception of vowels.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():103. PubMed ID: 16012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phonological memory traces do not contain phonetic information.
    Rhodes R; Han C; Hestvik A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 30989583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiovisual phonological mismatch produces early negativity in auditory cortex.
    Yumoto M; Uno A; Itoh K; Karino S; Saitoh O; Kaneko Y; Yatomi Y; Kaga K
    Neuroreport; 2005 May; 16(8):803-6. PubMed ID: 15891574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The right-hemispheric auditory cortex in humans is sensitive to degraded speech sounds.
    Liikkanen LA; Tiitinen H; Alku P; Leino S; Yrttiaho S; May PJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Apr; 18(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17413665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Language related differences of the sustained response evoked by natural speech sounds.
    Fan CS; Zhu X; Dosch HG; von Stutterheim C; Rupp A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180441. PubMed ID: 28727776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hemispheric processing of duration changes in speech and non-speech sounds.
    Takegata R; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M; Näätänen R
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jul; 15(10):1683-6. PubMed ID: 15232307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Functional specialization of the human auditory cortex in processing phonetic and musical sounds: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.
    Tervaniemi M; Kujala A; Alho K; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 1999 Mar; 9(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 10075902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Left-hemispheric brain activity reflects formant transitions in speech sounds.
    Mäkelä AM; Alku P; May PJ; Mäkinen V; Tiitinen H
    Neuroreport; 2005 Apr; 16(6):549-53. PubMed ID: 15812305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.
    Engineer CT; Rahebi KC; Buell EP; Fink MK; Kilgard MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():256-64. PubMed ID: 25827927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex.
    Sams M; Aulanko R; Hämäläinen M; Hari R; Lounasmaa OV; Lu ST; Simola J
    Neurosci Lett; 1991 Jun; 127(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 1881611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS; Möttönen R; Sams M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.