These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8260840)

  • 1. A wipe sampler for the quantitative measurement of dust on smooth surfaces: laboratory performance studies.
    Lioy PJ; Wainman T; Weisel C
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3(3):315-30. PubMed ID: 8260840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a standardized micro-vacuum sampling method for collection of surface dust.
    Ashley K; Applegate GT; Wise TJ; Fernback JE; Goldcamp MJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Mar; 4(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 17237027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory comparison of vacuum, OSHA, and HUD sampling methods for lead in household dust.
    Reynolds SJ; Etre L; Thorne PS; Whitten P; Selim M; Popendorf WJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 9183838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring dust on skin with a small vacuuming sampler--a comparison with other sampling techniques.
    Lundgren L; Skare L; Lidén C
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jan; 50(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 16216826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A field comparison of two methods for sampling lead in household dust.
    Rich DQ; Yiin LM; Rhoads GG; Glueck DH; Weisel C; Lioy PJ
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1999; 9(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 10321350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of a home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures.
    Lioy PJ; Yiin LM; Adgate J; Weisel C; Rhoads GG
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 9470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory evaluation of the CIP 10 personal dust sampler.
    Gero A; Tomb T
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Jun; 49(6):286-92. PubMed ID: 2840817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface sampling for a pesticide in dust and small spills of a solid dye.
    Que Hee SS; Shen Y; Tso JC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Aug; 16(8):809-15. PubMed ID: 11504358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. House dust collection efficiency of the high volume small surface sampler on worn carpets.
    Svendsen E; Thorne P; O'Shaughnessy P; Zimmerman D; Reynolds S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jun; 3(6):334-341. PubMed ID: 16718951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of composite dust wipe samples as a means of assessing lead exposure.
    Friederich NJ; Bauer KM; Schultz BD; Holderman TS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 10386353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. House dust levels of selected insecticides and a herbicide measured by the EL and LWW samplers and comparisons to hand rinses and urine metabolites.
    Lioy PJ; Edwards RD; Freeman N; Gurunathan S; Pellizzari E; Adgate JL; Quackenboss J; Sexton K
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 10981727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.
    Page SJ; Volkwein JC; Vinson RP; Joy GJ; Mischler SE; Tuchman DP; McWilliams LJ
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wood dust particle and mass concentrations and filtration efficiency in sanding of wood materials.
    Welling I; Lehtimäki M; Rautio S; Lähde T; Enbom S; Hynynen P; Hämeri K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Feb; 6(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 19065389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Airborne endotoxin in woodworking (joinery) shops.
    Harper M; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 16395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.