These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8261164)
1. In response to: Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Alternatives to randomization in surgical studies. Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Mar; 2(2):248. PubMed ID: 8261164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In response to: Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Alternatives to randomization in surgical studies. Turina M J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jan; 2(1):123. PubMed ID: 8269106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In response to: Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Alternatives to randomization in surgical studies. Huysmans H J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jan; 2(1):122-3. PubMed ID: 8269105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In response to: Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Alternatives to randomization in surgical studies. Blackstone EH J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jan; 2(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 8269104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reply to correspondence on randomization in surgical studies. Grunkemeier GL; Starr A J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 8269134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternatives to randomization in surgical studies. Grunkemeier GL; Starr A J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Nov; 1(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 1341621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials. Shahar E; Shahar DJ J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighted re-randomization tests for minimization with unbalanced allocation. Han B; Yu M; McEntegart D Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 23760923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A tale of two methods: randomization versus matching trials in clinical research. Spiegel D; Kraemer HC; Bloom JR Psychooncology; 1998; 7(5):371-5. PubMed ID: 9809328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does stentless aortic valve implantation increase perioperative risk? A critical appraisal of the literature and risk of bias analysis. Murtuza B; Pepper JR; Jones C; Nihoyannopoulos P; Darzi A; Athanasiou T Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 May; 39(5):643-52. PubMed ID: 20850984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Roaming through the methodology. XX. Randomization as a means of avoiding confounding through indication]. Zielhuis GA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(32):1528-31. PubMed ID: 10949635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of bias in methodology for randomized controlled trials published on implant dentistry. Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Ng CC; Wakefield CW J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16827739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A note on randomization and selection bias in maintenance therapy clinical trials. Greenhouse JB; Meyer MM Psychopharmacol Bull; 1991; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 1775592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in worldwide volume and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials. Ahmed Ali U; van der Sluis PC; Issa Y; Habaga IA; Gooszen HG; Flum DR; Algra A; Besselink MG Ann Surg; 2013 Aug; 258(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 23774315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The right thing to do with the wrong thing. Blackstone EH Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1025-6. PubMed ID: 22450059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]