These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8262763)
1. Guided by intimates. Nelson JL; Nelson HL Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 8262763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Decisions at the end of life. Guided by communities of patients. Emanuel LL; Emanuel EJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(5):6-14. PubMed ID: 8262772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advance directives, future selves and decision-making. Maclean AR Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):291-320. PubMed ID: 16901976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective autonomy: on the limits of shaping one's postcompetence medical fate. Cantor NL J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():13-48. PubMed ID: 10118983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions. Nazarko L Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Building a better advance directive: next steps. Shalowitz DI; Silveira MJ Am J Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(4):34-6. PubMed ID: 20379919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Autonomy and long-term-care practice: conclusions and next steps. Hofland BF; David D Generations; 1990; 14(Suppl. 1990):91-4. PubMed ID: 11651082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Incapacity and autonomy: striking a balance. Winninger D; Pineau L Health Law Can; 1995; 15(3):59-64. PubMed ID: 10141076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Competency for creation, use, and revocation of psychiatric advance directives. Srebnik DS; Kim SY J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):501-10. PubMed ID: 17185480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical treatment guardians: when someone else must decide. Gibson JM; Nathanson PS Generations; 1990; 14(Suppl. 1990):43-6. PubMed ID: 11651072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical and legal issues in long-term care: food for futuristic thought. Kane RA J Long Term Care Adm; 1993; 21(3):66-74. PubMed ID: 10133933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconceiving the family. The process of consent in medical decisionmaking. Kuczewski MG Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 8722524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing autonomy with paternalism for psychiatric patients? Ambiguities in personal choice and adcance directivesments [sic]. Sass HM Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2001 Oct; 2(1-2):18-28. PubMed ID: 15011652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legislative trends in nonjudicial surrogate health care decision making. Vignery B Clgh Rev; 1989; 23(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 11653878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ulysses in Minnesota: first steps toward a self-binding psychiatric advance directive statute. Cuca R Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Sep; 78(6):1152-86. PubMed ID: 10129666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Jun; (208):9-75. PubMed ID: 10158433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]