These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263196)

  • 1. Multiple stool examinations for ova and parasites and rate of false-negative results.
    Marti H; Koella JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Nov; 31(11):3044-5. PubMed ID: 8263196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to the editorial commentary "clinical importance of adequately performed stool ova and parasite examinations".
    Branda JA; Ferraro MJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 43(6):794-5. PubMed ID: 16912960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of multiple stool ova and parasite examinations in low-prevalence patient populations.
    Furuno JP; Maguire JH; Green HP; Johnson JA; Heimer R; Johnston SP; Braden CR; Edberg SC; Bell S; Hirshon JM
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 43(6):795-6. PubMed ID: 16912961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adequately performed stool ova and parasite examinations: is the best the enemy of the good?
    Hänscheid T; Valadas E
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Jul; 43(1):117-8. PubMed ID: 16758436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the FeKal CON-Trate system with the formalin-ethyl acetate technique for detection of intestinal parasites.
    Long EG; Tsin AT; Robinson BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):210-1. PubMed ID: 4031035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A rational approach to the stool ova and parasite examination.
    Branda JA; Lin TY; Rosenberg ES; Halpern EF; Ferraro MJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Apr; 42(7):972-8. PubMed ID: 16511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of multiple-stool-specimen ova and parasite examinations in a high-prevalence setting.
    Cartwright CP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Aug; 37(8):2408-11. PubMed ID: 10405376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost containment of formalin-preserved stool specimens for ova and parasites from outpatients.
    Peters CS; Hernandez L; Sheffield N; Chittom-Swiatlo AL; Kocka FE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):1584-5. PubMed ID: 3170715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Search for intestinal parasites: importance of repeat stool examination. Study of 5,367 patients].
    Bourée P; Botterel F; Lançon A; Bannelier E
    Presse Med; 1998 Sep; 27(27):1382. PubMed ID: 9793054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of stool ova and parasite examination in the tropics.
    Suputtamongkol Y; Waywa D; Assanasan S; Rongrungroeng Y; Bailey JW; Beeching NJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 43(6):793-4. PubMed ID: 16912959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical importance of adequately performed stool ova and parasite examinations.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Apr; 42(7):979-80. PubMed ID: 16511763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluation of the formalin-ether sedimentation method for the improvement of parasite egg recovery efficiency.
    Sato C; Rai SK; Uga S
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2014 Sep; 16(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 25799805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The need for three stool specimens in routine laboratory examinations for intestinal parasites.
    Nazer H; Greer W; Donnelly K; Mohamed AE; Yaish H; Kagalwalla A; Pavillard R
    Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 8334067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Golytely interferes with stool examination for ova and parasites.
    Burch WC; Schneider RP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1989; 35(5):471. PubMed ID: 2792694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of cryptosporidium in Rawalpindi/Islamabad a comparison of saline, iodine and stained preparations.
    Anwer F; Khan IA; Munir MA; Yousuf MO; Asghar H
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1990 Sep; 40(9):219-21. PubMed ID: 1701007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonutility of routine testing of stool for ova and parasites in a tertiary care Canadian centre.
    Mosli M; Gregor J; Chande N; Lannigan R
    Can J Microbiol; 2012 May; 58(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 22540249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False-positive reactions in the serological diagnosis of schistosomiasis.
    Schutte CH; Jackson TF; Visser PS; De Kock KN; Pretorius SJ
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Aug; 64(7):239-40. PubMed ID: 6348970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of rejection criteria for stool ovum and parasite examinations.
    Morris AJ; Wilson ML; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Dec; 30(12):3213-6. PubMed ID: 1452704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yield of stool cultures, ova and parasite tests, and Clostridium difficile determinations in nosocomial diarrheas.
    Yannelli B; Gurevich I; Schoch PE; Cunha BA
    Am J Infect Control; 1988 Dec; 16(6):246-9. PubMed ID: 3207206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parasitology: diagnostic yield of stool examination.
    Senay H; MacPherson D
    CMAJ; 1989 Jun; 140(11):1329-31. PubMed ID: 2720516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.