These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263450)

  • 1. Bending and metallurgical properties of rotary endodontic instruments. IV. Gates Glidden and Peeso drills.
    Lausten LL; Luebke NH; Brantley WA
    J Endod; 1993 Sep; 19(9):440-7. PubMed ID: 8263450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of engine-driven rotary endodontic instruments with a superimposed bending deflection: V. Gates Glidden and Peeso drills.
    Brantley WA; Luebke NH; Luebke FL; Mitchell JC
    J Endod; 1994 May; 20(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 7931016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical dimensions, torsional performance, and metallurgical properties of rotary endodontic instruments. 3. Peeso drills.
    Luebke NH; Brantley WA; Sabri ZI; Luebke JH
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1402558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physical dimensions, torsional performance, bending properties, and metallurgical characteristics of rotary endodontic instruments. VI. Canal Master drills.
    Luebke NH; Brantley WA; Sabri ZI; Luebke FL; Lausten LL
    J Endod; 1995 May; 21(5):259-63. PubMed ID: 7673827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Torsional and metallurgical properties of rotary endodontic instruments. 2. Stainless steel Gates Glidden drills.
    Luebke NH; Brantley WA
    J Endod; 1991 Jul; 17(7):319-23. PubMed ID: 1779217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of sterilization procedures on the cutting efficiency of stainless steel and carbon steel Gates Glidden drills.
    Zettlemoyer TL; Goerig AC; Nagy WW; Grabow W
    J Endod; 1989 Nov; 15(11):522-5. PubMed ID: 2517952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture.
    Tepel J; Schäfer E; Hoppe W
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9594751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests.
    Kazemi RB; Stenman E; Spångberg LS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 11027388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of diameter variation of Gates-Glidden drills on torsion resistance.
    Lopes HP; Elias CN; Estrela C; Costa Filho A
    Braz Dent J; 1994; 5(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8974547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Torsional and stiffness properties of Canal Master U stainless steel and nitinol instruments.
    Camps J; Pertot WJ
    J Endod; 1994 Aug; 20(8):395-8. PubMed ID: 7996107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Wilson P; Speisser JM; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):731-5. PubMed ID: 9855823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Torsional properties of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel endodontic files.
    Wolcott J; Himel VT
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 9594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between design features of endodontic instruments and their properties. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture.
    Schäfer E; Tepel J
    J Endod; 2001 Apr; 27(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 11485273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of spreader penetration depth and load required during lateral condensation in teeth prepared using various root canal preparation techniques.
    Dulaimi SF; Wali Al-Hashimi MK
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):510-5. PubMed ID: 16011768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts.
    Purton DG; Payne JA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 9063218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Torsional strength of Gates Glidden drills exposed to clinical conditions.
    Svec TA; Powers JM
    J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 10204471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical dimensions and torsional properties of rotary endodontic instruments. 1. Gates Glidden drills.
    Luebke NH; Brantley WA
    J Endod; 1990 Sep; 16(9):438-41. PubMed ID: 2098462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-Fluted orthopaedic drills exhibit superior bending stiffness to their 2-fluted rivals: clinical implications for targeting ability and the incidence of drill-bit failure.
    Bertollo N; Gothelf TK; Walsh WR
    Injury; 2008 Jul; 39(7):734-41. PubMed ID: 18490018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified uses of the Gates Glidden drill. An in-vitro study.
    Mounce RE; Hossaini M; Zetab H
    J Oreg Dent Assoc; 1991; 61(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 1819654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.