These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263452)

  • 1. Cleaning of oval canals using ultrasonic or sonic instrumentation.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW
    J Endod; 1993 Sep; 19(9):453-7. PubMed ID: 8263452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW
    J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 1298802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post space debridement in oval-shaped canals: the use of a new ultrasonic tip with oval section.
    Coniglio I; Carvalho CA; Magni E; Cantoro A; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):752-5. PubMed ID: 18498906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
    Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):593-6. PubMed ID: 16104971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debris retention and wear in three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Ebrahim AK; Suda H
    Aust Endod J; 2006 Dec; 32(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 17201751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative gravimetric analysis of the drilling capacity of sonic vibrating instruments].
    Carli PO; Favero GA; Longhin D; Morello M
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 2485793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals.
    Sabins RA; Johnson JD; Hellstein JW
    J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):674-8. PubMed ID: 14606795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals.
    Jensen SA; Walker TL; Hutter JW; Nicoll BK
    J Endod; 1999 Nov; 25(11):735-8. PubMed ID: 10726540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.