These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263465)

  • 1. Categories and resemblance.
    Rips LJ; Collins A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1993 Dec; 122(4):468-86. PubMed ID: 8263465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recognition and categorization of butterfly patterns].
    Hakoda Y; Ando M; Nakamizo S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Apr; 64(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 8355434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Premise typicality as feature inference decision-making in perceptual categories.
    Morgan EL; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):817-836. PubMed ID: 34623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.
    Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1721-39. PubMed ID: 22537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of varying levels of expertise on decisions of category typicality.
    Johnson KE
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):1036-50. PubMed ID: 11820747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the determinants of the graded structure of vocal emotion expressions.
    Laukka P; Audibert N; Aubergé V
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 21851327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments relative to patterns: how temporal sequence patterns affect judgments and memory.
    Kusev P; Ayton P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Stewart N; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1874-86. PubMed ID: 21967269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associative and similarity-based processes in categorization decisions.
    Hampton JA
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):625-40. PubMed ID: 9337581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category dominance in verifying category membership.
    Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 2939182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of instance retrieval in understanding complex concepts.
    Gray KC; Smith EE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):665-74. PubMed ID: 8538440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories.
    Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarity in context.
    Goldstone RL; Medin DL; Halberstadt J
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 9099074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting features for members of natural categories when categorization is uncertain.
    Malt BC; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 May; 21(3):646-61. PubMed ID: 7602266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is typical about the typicality effect in category-based induction?
    Rein JR; Goldwater MB; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 20234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Altering object representations through category learning.
    Goldstone RL; Lippa Y; Shiffrin RM
    Cognition; 2001 Jan; 78(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 11062321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Neural Mechanism of Social Categorization.
    Stolier RM; Freeman JB
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(23):5711-5721. PubMed ID: 28483974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options.
    Davis T; Love BC
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20424052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ideals and category typicality.
    Kim S; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1092-112. PubMed ID: 21767059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions.
    Duffy S; Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Crawford LE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 20382924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.