127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263822)
1. Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor.
Weiss MR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 8263822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise.
Chang JE; Bai JY; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 2):2598-601. PubMed ID: 17152439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
Wolfe J; Schafer E; Parkinson A; John A; Hudson M; Wheeler J; Mucci A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22941405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [CILAB--a PC-based laboratory speech processor for implementation and evaluation of new stimulation strategies for cochlear implants].
Mitterbacher A; Lampacher P; Zierhofer C; Hochmair E
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):146-52. PubMed ID: 15279463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
Donaldson GS; Allen SL
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of different synthesis signals in acoustic models of cochlear implants.
Strydom T; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):920-33. PubMed ID: 21361449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intelligibility and listener preference of telephone speech in the presence of babble noise.
Hall JL; Flanagan JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 20058974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic formant tracking of noisy speech using temporal analysis on outputs from a nonlinear cochlear model.
Deng L; Kheirallah I
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):456-67. PubMed ID: 8225334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved speech processing strategy for cochlear implants based on an active nonlinear filterbank model of the biological cochlea.
Kim KH; Choi SJ; Kim JH; Kim DH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):828-36. PubMed ID: 19272890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
Lan N; Nie KB; Gao SK; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
