These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263822)

  • 21. The application of bionic wavelet transform to speech signal processing in cochlear implants using neural network simulations.
    Yao J; Zhang YT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1299-309. PubMed ID: 12450360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech production changes with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Cummings S; Groenewald E; Coetzee L; Hugo R; Van Derlinde M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():394-7. PubMed ID: 7668719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Across-frequency delays based on the cochlear traveling wave: enhanced speech presentation for cochlear implants.
    Taft DA; Grayden DB; Burkitt AN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):596-606. PubMed ID: 19846368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Noise reduction technologies implemented in head-worn preprocessors for improving cochlear implant performance in reverberant noise fields.
    Chung K; Nelson L; Teske M
    Hear Res; 2012 Sep; 291(1-2):41-51. PubMed ID: 22750449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wearable digital speech processor for cochlear implants using a TMS320C25.
    Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():120-7. PubMed ID: 2356719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Study on the effect of spectral details encoding in speech processing on Mandarin recognition for cochlear implants users with speech maskers].
    Guan T; Xu T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18610637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Neuman AC; Haravon A; Sislian N; Waltzman SB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 17204900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An analysis of the effects of electrical field interaction with an acoustic model of cochlear implants.
    Strydom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2213-26. PubMed ID: 21476676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of noise reduction systems for cochlear implant users in different acoustic environment.
    Hamacher V; Doering WH; Mauer G; Fleischmann H; Hennecke J
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S46-9. PubMed ID: 9391593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.