These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8263825)

  • 1. Behavioral assessment of adaptive feedback equalization in a digital hearing aid.
    French-St George M; Wood DJ; Engebretson AM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8263825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 20808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm.
    Engebretson AM; French-St George M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 8263831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive feedback stabilization of hearing aids.
    Engebretson AM; French-St George M; O'Connell MP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():56-64. PubMed ID: 8153565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV; Dyer RK; Matthews P; Wood MW
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system.
    Roland PS; Shoup AG; Shea MC; Richey HS; Jones DB
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Oct; 111(10):1682-6. PubMed ID: 11801925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-ear measurement verification for open, non-occluding hearing instruments.
    Lantz J; Jensen OD; Haastrup A; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17365050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital hearing aid users.
    Magni C; Freiberger F; Tonn K
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 16612528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Physiologico-acoustic aspects of improving speech perception in sensorineural and conductive hearing loss].
    Moroz BS
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 4007327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-programmable hearing aid.
    Mangold S; Eriksson-Mangold M; Israelsson B; Leijon A; Ringdahl A
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():70-5. PubMed ID: 2356739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiments with a programmable master hearing aid.
    Levitt H; Sullivan JA; Neuman AC; Rubin-Spitz JA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):29-54. PubMed ID: 3430388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.