423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8264433)
1. Comparison of fluorogenic and conventional membrane filter media for enumerating coliform bacteria.
Cenci G; De Bartolomeo A; Caldini G
Microbios; 1993; 76(306):47-54. PubMed ID: 8264433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A combined chromogenic-fluorogenic medium for the simultaneous detection of coliform groups and E. coli in water].
Manafi M; Kneifel W
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Dec; 189(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 2697207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative performance of Colisure.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Membrane filtration differentiation of E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water.
Mates A; Shaffer M
J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Sep; 67(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 2693426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the recoveries of Escherichia coli and total coliforms from drinking water by the MI agar method and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved membrane filter method.
Brenner KP; Rankin CC; Sivaganesan M; Scarpino PV
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 62(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 8572697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid detection of fluorescent and chemiluminescent total coliforms and Escherichia coli on membrane filters.
Van Poucke SO; Nelis HJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2000 Nov; 42(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 11044567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluorogenic detection of atypical coliforms from water samples.
Cenci G; Caldini G; Sfodera F; Morozzi G
Microbiologica; 1990 Apr; 13(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 2112678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative performance of Colisure (TM) and accepted methods in the detection of chlorine-injured total coliforms and E.coli.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
Water Sci Technol; 1995; 31(5-6):259-61. PubMed ID: 11539133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples.
Hörman A; Hänninen ML
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(17):3249-56. PubMed ID: 16916531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [MUG-lauryl sulfate bouillon--an optimal medium for the detection of total coliforms and fecal coliform bacteria in relation to hygienic evaluation of bathing waters according to the European Community Guideline 76/160 EWG].
Schindler PR
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 Apr; 191(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 1872943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of MUG-supplemented media for the detection of E. coli in recreational water surveillance.
Neidhardt S; Havemeister G; Höller C; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 9353534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the methods for enumerating coliform bacteria from water samples using precise reference standards.
Wohlsen T; Bates J; Vesey G; Robinson WA; Katouli M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 42(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 16599987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison study of membrane filtration direct count and an automated coliform and Escherichia coli detection system for on-site water quality testing.
Habash M; Johns R
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Oct; 79(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 19703500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of BGB-MUG and LSTB-MUG in microbiological surveillance of recreational waters.
Höller C; Havemeister G; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 9353533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Coli-ID and MUG Plus media for recovering Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria from groundwater samples.
Sueiro RA; Araujo M; Santos CJ; Gómez MJ; Garrido MJ
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(12):213-6. PubMed ID: 11464759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experiences with the detection of E. coli and coliform bacteria with reference to the drinking water regulation of 1986].
Hübner I; Knoll C; Obst U
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1989 Feb; 187(3):209-5. PubMed ID: 2494815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid detection of total and fecal coliforms in water by enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-methylumbelliferone-beta-D-galactoside.
Berg JD; Fiksdal L
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1988 Aug; 54(8):2118-22. PubMed ID: 3178215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
