These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8265148)

  • 1. Reliability of visual performance measurement under optical degradation.
    Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Apr; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 8265148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast sensitivity measurements with the Echelon diffractive bifocal contact lens as compared to bifocal spectacles.
    Sanislo S; Wicker D; Green DG
    CLAO J; 1992 Jul; 18(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 1499121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart.
    Haymes SA; Chen J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):308-16. PubMed ID: 15181355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses.
    Van Meter WS; Gussler JR; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 2379307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J; Wicks J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.
    Thakur S; Ichhpujani P; Kumar S; Kaur R; Sood S
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 29755121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective and subjective visual performance of multifocal contact lenses: pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Flores M; Gaib S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 24184091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vision and task performance with monovision and diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Gan CM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Aug; 69(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 1513556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Llorente-Guillemot A; García-Lazaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Perez-Cambrodi RJ; Cerviño A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22070196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.