These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8265148)

  • 21. Intra-eye visual function comparison with and without a central hole contact lens-based system: potential applications to ICL design.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Belda-Salmerón L; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 29(10):702-7. PubMed ID: 24094310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children.
    Anderson HA; Mathew AR; Cheng H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Jan; 43(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 36164764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Task and visual performance with concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 68(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 1923325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Hybrid material contact lens in keratoconus and myopic astigmatism patients].
    Leal F; Lipener C; Chalita MR; Uras R; Campos M; Höfling-Lima AL
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 17589695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual performance of scleral lenses and their impact on quality of life in patients with irregular corneas.
    Ozek D; Kemer OE; Altiaylik P
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2018 Nov./Dec.; 81(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 30231157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of the anterior constant focus (ACF) annular bifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1993 Oct; 19(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8261605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9. PubMed ID: 7645278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Task and visual performance with contact lenses and spectacles.
    Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Poon L; Sakuda T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 May; 69(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 1594194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers' recognition performance under day or night conditions.
    Wood JM; Owens DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):698-705. PubMed ID: 16127335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Objective and subjective assessment of a new diffractive trifocal contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Belkin M
    Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985); 1996-1997; 19-20():41-4. PubMed ID: 11548785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts.
    Reeves BC; Wood JM; Hill AR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Jan; 13(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 8510943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing for sports vision.
    Zimmerman AB; Lust KL; Bullimore MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2011 May; 37(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 21378574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Señaris A; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1930-5. PubMed ID: 17964400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino G; Casuccio A; Pasti M; Bono V; Mencucci R; Cillino S
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 23953097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
    Rijal S; Cheng H; Marsack JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 34418124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Increasing negative spherical aberration with soft contact lenses improves high and low contrast visual acuity in young adults.
    Rae SM; Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; Theagarayan B; Price HC; Sailaganathan A; Calver RI; O'Leary DJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 19663925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses.
    Martin JA; Roorda A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 14688544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diurnal variations in visual performance for disposable contact lenses.
    Belda-Salmerón L; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; Madrid-Costa D; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):682-90. PubMed ID: 23770656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.
    Mojzis P; Kukuckova L; Majerova K; Liehneova K; Piñero DP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):666-72. PubMed ID: 25291749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Axis-free correction of astigmatism using bifocal soft contact lenses.
    Leube A; Kovats I; Wahl S; Sickenberger W
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Dec; 40(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 28935527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.