129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8265797)
1. Care allegedly provided without proper supervision. Case in point: Raicevich v. Plum Creek Medical P.C. 918 F. Supp. 2d 929--CO (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Nov; 34(6):4. PubMed ID: 8265797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Liability for student nurse anesthetist: $3.2 million award. Case in point: Hampton v. Greenfield (576 So. 2d 630--LA (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):2. PubMed ID: 1841399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurses fail to respond to emergency "stat". Case in point: Garcia v. U.S. (697 F. Supp. 1579--CO (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jan; 29(8):4. PubMed ID: 2922484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Board attempts to sanction administrator for acts of nurses. Case on point: Tryon v. Colorado State Bd. of Nursing, 989 P.2d 216 - CO (1999).
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Mar; 40(10):2. PubMed ID: 11995171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to order biopsy for breast lump: death results. Case in point: kennedy v. U.S. (750 F. Supp. 206--LA (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jan; 31(8):4. PubMed ID: 1998072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure to follow protocols: hospital vulnerability. Case in point: Romo v. Union Memorial Hospital, Inc. 878 F. Supp. 837--NC (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 May; 35(12):2. PubMed ID: 7597167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurse "fails to recall": blockbuster judgment. Case in point: Salas v. Wang (846 F. 2d 897--NJ 1988).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Aug; 29(3):2. PubMed ID: 3413281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal issues in neonatal nursing: considerations for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses.
Enzman Hagedorn MI; Gardner SL
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1999; 28(3):320-30. PubMed ID: 10363544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital "self-insured": nurse's insurer liable. Case in point: Wake County Hosp. System v. National Casualty Co. (804 F. Supp. 2d 768--NC [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Feb; 33(9):2. PubMed ID: 8484000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Professional misconduct case studies. Case 18: Sexual harassment. Nurse who sexually harassed staff during teaching sessions.
Br J Nurs; 2000 Jan 13-26; 9(1):9. PubMed ID: 10887840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nursing records "missing": spoilation of evidence. Case in point: Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Wash. 881 P. 2d 304--AK (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):2. PubMed ID: 7838971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Fall risk' ignored: broken hip & death result. Case on point: Lamarca v. U.S., 31 F. Supp.2d 110-NY (1998).
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Mar; 39(10):4. PubMed ID: 10232274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse's failure to phone M.D.: hospital liability. Case in point: Nutty v. Jewish Hospital (571 F. Supp. 1050-IL).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Jan; 24(8):2. PubMed ID: 6560672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A differential diagnosis is key.
Klein CA
Nurse Pract; 2000 Jun; 25(6 Pt 1):98. PubMed ID: 10884999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Posey restrained pt. chokes--brain damage: immunity issue. Case in point: Allen v. Montgomery Hosp. 668 A. 2d 565--PA (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Feb; 36(9):4. PubMed ID: 8711129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
