These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8267944)

  • 1. Accuracy and reproducibility of 30 devices for self-measurement of arterial blood pressure.
    van Egmond J; Lenders JW; Weernink E; Thien T
    Am J Hypertens; 1993 Oct; 6(10):873-9. PubMed ID: 8267944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
    Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
    Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative accuracy of three automated techniques in the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure in men.
    Lehmann KG; Gelman JA; Weber MA; Lafrades A
    Am J Cardiol; 1998 Apr; 81(8):1004-12. PubMed ID: 9576161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wrist measurement of blood pressure: some critical remarks to oscillometry.
    Weber F; Erbel R; Schäfers R; Philipp T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 1999; 22(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 10394116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of four indirect methods of blood pressure measurement, with hemodynamic correlations.
    Gravlee GP; Brockschmidt JK
    J Clin Monit; 1990 Oct; 6(4):284-98. PubMed ID: 2230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The CNAP™ Finger Cuff for Noninvasive Beat-To-Beat Monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure: An Evaluation in Intensive Care Unit Patients and a Comparison with 2 Intermittent Devices.
    Lakhal K; Martin M; Faiz S; Ehrmann S; Blanloeil Y; Asehnoune K; Rozec B; Boulain T
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Nov; 123(5):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 27159068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of invasive blood pressure measurement in the aorta with indirect oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the wrist and forearm].
    Saul F; Aristidou Y; Klaus D; Wiemeyer A; Lösse B
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):675-85. PubMed ID: 8525669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
    Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect and direct simultaneous, comparative blood pressure measurements with the Bosotron 2 device.
    Weber F; Lindemann M; Erbel R; Philipp T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 1999; 22(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 10394117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the IITC tail cuff blood pressure recorder in the rat against intraarterial pressure according to criteria for human devices.
    Jamieson MJ; Gonzales GM; Jackson TI; Koerth SM; Romano WF; Tan DX; Castillon F; Skinner MH; Grossmann M; Shepherd AM
    Am J Hypertens; 1997 Feb; 10(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 9037330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Devices for blood pressure self measurement: tested in comparison.
    Anlauf M; Tholl U; Högermeyer D; Hirche H; Roggenbuck U; Simonides R
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():20-5. PubMed ID: 8896295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of variability in blood pressure measurement using the Dinamap PRO 100 automated oscillometric device.
    Chang JJ; Rabinowitz D; Shea S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 158(12):1218-26. PubMed ID: 14652308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.