These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8268565)

  • 1. A non-invasive technique to quantify in vitro bioprosthetic valvular coaptation.
    Gross JM; Christie GW
    ASAIO J; 1993; 39(3):M392-7. PubMed ID: 8268565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flat or curved pericardial aortic valve cusps: a finite element study.
    Lim KH; Candra J; Yeo JH; Duran CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 15473482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A coupled fluid-structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root.
    Nicosia MA; Cochran RP; Einstein DR; Rutland CJ; Kunzelman KS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):781-9. PubMed ID: 14658821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of sizing and method of fixation on the hydrodynamic function of stentless, free-hand inserted porcine bioprosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 9263877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations.
    Kim H; Chandran KB; Sacks MS; Lu J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 17089074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic impact stress analysis of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Yuan Q; Xu L; Ngoi BK; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12578344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation and valve constraint conditions on porcine aortic valve leaflet coaptation.
    Broom ND; Marra D
    Thorax; 1982 Aug; 37(8):620-6. PubMed ID: 6817442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element investigation of stentless pericardial aortic valves: relevance of leaflet geometry.
    Xiong FL; Goetz WA; Chong CK; Chua YL; Pfeifer S; Wintermantel E; Yeo JH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 20213213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress analysis of the aortic valve with and without the sinuses of valsalva.
    Beck A; Thubrikar MJ; Robicsek F
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11206754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible versus rigid ring annuloplasty for mitral valve annular dilatation: a finite element model.
    Kunzelman KS; Reimink MS; Cochran RP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jan; 7(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 9502148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to characterize the geometry of fatigued porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Smith DB; Sacks MS; Pattany PM; Schroeder R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 9263876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: finite-element modeling of Marfan syndrome.
    Grande-Allen KJ; Cochran RP; Reinhall PG; Kunzelman KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Nov; 122(5):946-54. PubMed ID: 11689800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic simulation pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve function.
    Kim H; Lu J; Sacks MS; Chandran KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 16995758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.