437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8268839)
1. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations.
Chalker SA; Lumley PJ
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):151-6. PubMed ID: 8268839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tunnel restorations using glass ionomer or glass cermet: in vitro marginal ridge fracture and microleakage.
Shetty R; Munshi AK
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9161212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite].
Croll TP
Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
Wiegand A; Attin T
Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
Croll TP
ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
Cannon ML
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
Hasselrot L
Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
Ferdianakis K; White GE
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
