These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8268844)

  • 1. Operating variables affecting the working time of a dual-cure composite luting cement.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Fisher SE; Harrington E
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 8268844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Degree of conversion of dual-cure luting resins light-polymerized through various materials.
    Tezvergil-Mutluay A; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Aug; 65(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 17762981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: influence of luting agents and aging conditions.
    Gu XH; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 12737239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Luting of inlays, onlays, and overlays with preheated restorative composite resin does not prevent seating accuracy.
    Magne P; Razaghy M; Carvalho MA; Soares LM
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 30073216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from try-in to 1-week post-cementation.
    Good ML; Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 19013703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Marginal behavior of "Kulzer" composite inlays under simultaneous mechanical and thermal loading].
    Hannig M; Rahlf B; Schlichting B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):618-20. PubMed ID: 1817945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis.
    Acquaviva PA; Cerutti F; Adami G; Gagliani M; Ferrari M; Gherlone E; Cerutti A
    J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 19450917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percentage cure of cement cured through various thicknesses of Cerec porcelain.
    Prinsloo LC; van der Vyver PJ; Ferreira MR; Heyns AM
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 May; 52(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 9461947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.