These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8269103)

  • 1. Progression of aortic stenosis in adults: new insights provided by Doppler echocardiography.
    Roger VL; Tajik AJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jan; 2(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 8269103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.
    Faggiano P; Gualeni A; Antonini-Canterin F; Rusconi C; Nicolosi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 29(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 10546122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing a Continuous Quality Improvement Program in a High-Volume Clinical Echocardiography Laboratory: Improving Care for Patients With Aortic Stenosis.
    Samad Z; Minter S; Armour A; Tinnemore A; Sivak JA; Sedberry B; Strub K; Horan SM; Harrison JK; Kisslo J; Douglas PS; Velazquez EJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 26957220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation.
    Ho PP; Pauls GL; Lamberton DF; Portnoff JS; Pai RG; Shah PM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 8087265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of serial stenoses.
    Scantlebury DC; Geske JB; Nishimura RA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):850-2. PubMed ID: 24046382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.
    Pai RG; Pai AD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 21714420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative value of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in the decision to operate on patients with aortic stenosis.
    Leborgne L; Tribouilloy C; Otmani A; Peltier M; Rey JL; Lesbre JP
    Int J Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 65(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 9706811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic evaluation of suspected severe aortic stenosis leads to a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.
    Lake M; Tanawuttiwat T; Bilsker M; De Marchena E
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2015 Feb; 42(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 25873807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of echocardiography/Doppler in catheter balloon treatment of adults with aortic and mitral stenosis.
    Reid CL; Rahimtoola SH
    Circulation; 1991 Sep; 84(3 Suppl):I240-9. PubMed ID: 1884492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].
    Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation between Doppler echocardiography and invasive determination of left ventricular hemodynamic valve parameters. A comparative study under routine conditions in a cardiology center].
    Nellessen U; Boll P; Inselmann G; Hecker H; Simon R
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Apr; 82(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 8506723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preoperative evaluation of severe aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography and hemodynamics].
    Palomo Villada JA; Arriaga Nava R; Valencia Sánchez JS; Ledesma Velasco M; Skromne Kadlubik D
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1998; 68(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9656084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnosis and assessment of severity of aortic valve stenosis].
    Franke A; Kühl HP
    Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):644-9. PubMed ID: 17072777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler echocardiographic methods to estimate severity of aortic stenosis.
    Raggi P; Vasavada BC; Rodney E; el-Jandali A; Dogan O; Sacchi TJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 76(8):615-8. PubMed ID: 7677091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metabolic syndrome negatively influences disease progression and prognosis in aortic stenosis.
    Briand M; Lemieux I; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Cartier A; Després JP; Arsenault M; Couet J; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 47(11):2229-36. PubMed ID: 16750688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic stenosis: assessment of the patient at risk.
    Yeo KK; Low RI
    J Interv Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 20(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 18042056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in patients requiring valve surgery: search for a 'gold standard'.
    Cujec B; Welsh R; Aboguddah A; Reeder B
    Can J Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 8(8):829-38. PubMed ID: 1423004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemodynamic assessment of aortic stenosis: are there still lessons to learn?
    Baumgartner H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):138-40. PubMed ID: 16386677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Correlation of the transaortic gradient determined with doppler echocardiography versus catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis].
    Illescas J; Enciso R; Vidrio M; de la Torre N; Baduí E
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1991; 61(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 1854227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical value of echo Doppler evaluation of aortic and mitral stenosis: a comparative study with cardiac catheterization.
    Bitar J; Douthat L; Alam M; Rosman HS; Lebeis M; Goldstein S; Khaja F
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1990; 38(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 2228721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.