249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8269115)
1. Doppler-derived aortic valve gradients: imaging versus non-imaging techniques.
Tavli T; Ammar A; Wong M
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 8269115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet.
VanAuker MD; Hla A; Meisner JS; Strom JA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 10772051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doppler Imaging in Aortic Stenosis: The Importance of the Nonapical Imaging Windows to Determine Severity in a Contemporary Cohort.
Thaden JJ; Nkomo VT; Lee KJ; Oh JK
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Jul; 28(7):780-5. PubMed ID: 25857547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subaortic flow profiles in aortic valve disease: a two-dimensional color Doppler study.
Sjöberg BJ; Ask P; Loyd D; Wranne B
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1994; 7(3 Pt 1):276-85. PubMed ID: 8060644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical experience and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the first one hundred ATS AP (advanced performance) prosthetic valve in the aortic position.
Jazayeri S; Gomez MC; Tatou E; Ecarnot A; Saleh M; Bouchot O; Renaud C; Brenot R; David M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Sep; 12(5):628-34; discussion 634. PubMed ID: 14565717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of multiple echocardiographic views in the evaluation of aortic stenosis in adults by continuous-wave Doppler.
Williams GA; Labovitz AJ; Nelson JG; Kennedy HL
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 55(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 3969883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of high transvalvular velocities early after implantation of Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
Bach DS; Lemire MS; Eberhart D; Armstrong WF; Deeb GM
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 10947047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures.
Torii R; El-Hamamsy I; Donya M; Babu-Narayan SV; Ibrahim M; Kilner PJ; Mohiaddin RH; Xu XY; Yacoub MH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 22361248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valves].
Kisanuki A; Tei C; Arikawa K; Otsuji Y; Kawazoe Y; Natsugoe K; Tanaka H; Morishita Y; Taira A
J Cardiogr; 1986 Mar; 16(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 3782875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure gradients across bileaflet aortic valves by direct measurement and echocardiography.
Laske A; Jenni R; Maloigne M; Vassalli G; Bertel O; Turina MI
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Jan; 61(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 8561632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of the right parasternal view and non-imaging continuous-wave Doppler transducer for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in the modern area.
de Monchy CC; Lepage L; Boutron I; Leye M; Detaint D; Hyafil F; Brochet E; Iung B; Vahanian A; Messika-Zeitoun D
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 May; 10(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 19036750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Limitation of Doppler echocardiography in evaluation of aortic valve prostheses]].
Geibel A; Kasper W; Fraedrich G; Konstantinides S; Schöllhorn J; Tiede N; Just H
Z Kardiol; 1993 Mar; 82(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 8475654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abnormal systolic intraventricular flow velocities after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Mechanisms, predictive factors, and prognostic significance.
Bartunek J; Sys SU; Rodrigues AC; van Schuerbeeck E; Mortier L; de Bruyne B
Circulation; 1996 Feb; 93(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 8641000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in the diagnosis of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction by transesophageal echocardiography.
Zabalgoitia M; Herrera CJ; Chaudhry FA; Calhoon JH; Mehlman DJ; O'Rourke RA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Sep; 2(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 8269173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in patients requiring valve surgery: search for a 'gold standard'.
Cujec B; Welsh R; Aboguddah A; Reeder B
Can J Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 8(8):829-38. PubMed ID: 1423004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis.
Adams JC; Jiamsripong P; Belohlavek M; McMahon EM; Marupakula V; Heys J; Chaliki HP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Mar; 20(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 21560814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis.
Bengur AR; Snider AR; Meliones JN; Vermilion RP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1499-505. PubMed ID: 1939952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of variability and reproducibility of echocardiography measurements in valvular aortic valve stenosis.
Moura LM; Ramos SF; Pinto FJ; Barros IM; Rocha-Gonçalves F
Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 Jan; 30(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 21425741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
