These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8269147)

  • 41. New insights in minimally invasive valve replacement: description of a cooperative approach for the off-pump replacement of mitral valves.
    Boudjemline Y; Pineau E; Borenstein N; Behr L; Bonhoeffer P
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(19):2013-7. PubMed ID: 15872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bubble observation and transient pressure signals in mechanical heart valve cavitation study.
    Lijun X; Hock YJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 12701797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzymes in porcine aortic heart valves: implications for bioprosthetic heart valve degeneration.
    Simionescu DT; Lovekamp JJ; Vyavahare NR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 12701795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Could activated tissue remodeling be considered as early marker for progressive valve degeneration? Comparative analysis of checkpoint and ECM remodeling gene expression in native degenerating aortic valves and after bioprosthetic replacement.
    Yeghiazaryan K; Skowasch D; Bauriedel G; Schild H; Golubnitschaja O
    Amino Acids; 2007 Jan; 32(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16874466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Durability/wear testing of heart valve substitutes.
    Reul H; Potthast K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 9587854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accelerated life testing of prosthetic heart valves.
    Fettel BE; Johnston DR; Morris PE
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 7382899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of valve holder flexibility on cavitation initiation with mechanical heart valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Lee CS; Aluri S; Chandran KB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 8834733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Study of an acoustic technique to detect cavitation produced by a tilting disc valve.
    Herman BA; Porter JM; Carey RF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 8834731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
    Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Flow-induced platelet activation in a St. Jude mechanical heart valve, a trileaflet polymeric heart valve, and a St. Jude tissue valve.
    Yin W; Gallocher S; Pinchuk L; Schoephoerster RT; Jesty J; Bluestein D
    Artif Organs; 2005 Oct; 29(10):826-31. PubMed ID: 16185345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.
    Bernacca GM; McColl JH; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 15222295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bioprosthetic heart valves: modes of failure.
    Siddiqui RF; Abraham JR; Butany J
    Histopathology; 2009 Aug; 55(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 19694820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior.
    Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Differentiated evaluation of heart valve stenosis by expanded Bernoulli equation--in vitro studies of model stenoses].
    Wendt MO; Pohl M; Werner S; Kühnel R; Toppel D
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):686-93. PubMed ID: 8525670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dynamic impact stress analysis of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Yuan Q; Xu L; Ngoi BK; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12578344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.