These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8269794)

  • 1. Effectiveness of glucose monitoring systems modified for the visually impaired.
    Bernbaum M; Albert SG; Brusca S; McGinnis J; Miller D; Hoffmann JW; Mooradian AD
    Diabetes Care; 1993 Oct; 16(10):1363-6. PubMed ID: 8269794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accessibility of blood glucose monitoring systems for blind and visually impaired people.
    Uslan MM; Eghtesadi K; Burton D
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(3):439-48. PubMed ID: 12828828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia.
    Trajanoski Z; Brunner GA; Gfrerer RJ; Wach P; Pieber TR
    Diabetes Care; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1412-5. PubMed ID: 8941473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches.
    Brunner GA; Ellmerer M; Sendlhofer G; Wutte A; Trajanoski Z; Schaupp L; Quehenberger F; Wach P; Krejs GJ; Pieber TR
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Apr; 21(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 9571347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of three blood glucose meters.
    Rheney CC; Kirk JK
    Ann Pharmacother; 2000 Mar; 34(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 10917376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.
    Pfützner A; Mitri M; Musholt PB; Sachsenheimer D; Borchert M; Yap A; Forst T
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference studies with two hospital-grade and two home-grade glucose meters.
    Lyon ME; Baskin LB; Braakman S; Presti S; Dubois J; Shirey T
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Oct; 11(10):641-7. PubMed ID: 19821756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of tactile techniques for self-monitoring of blood glucose in visually impaired patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Prior JC; Alojado NC; Hunt JA; Begg IS
    Diabetes Care; 1984; 7(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 6468230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of Optium Xceed (Abbott) and One Touch Ultra (Lifescan) glucose meters].
    Coyne S; Lacour B; Hennequin-Le Meur C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2008; 66(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 18558561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the accuracy of glucose reflectance meters in pregnant insulin-dependent diabetics.
    Harkness LJ; Ashwood ER; Parsons S; Lenke RR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Feb; 77(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 1988877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of newer-generation home blood glucose meters in a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) inpatient exercise study.
    Weinzimer SA; Beck RW; Chase HP; Fox LA; Buckingham BA; Tamborlane WV; Kollman C; Coffey J; Xing D; Ruedy KJ;
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):675-80; discussion 681-3. PubMed ID: 16241867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of One Touch HORIZON--a highly affordable glucose monitor.
    Mohan V; Deepa R; Shefali AK; Poongothai S; Monica M; Karkuzhali K
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2004 Oct; 52():779-82. PubMed ID: 15909854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Perspective on the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Meters During Pregnancy.
    Immanuel J; Simmons D
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Oct; 41(10):2053-2058. PubMed ID: 30237233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation on the accuracy of the blood glucose monitoring device Prestige IQ.
    Larbig M; Forst T; Mondok A; Forst S; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2003 Aug; 16(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 14768776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three new glucose reflectance meters: Diascan, Glucometer II, and Reflolux II.
    Thai AC; Ng WY; Lui KF; Yeo PP
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1989 Jun; 7(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 2752892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytical performance of glucometers used for routine glucose self-monitoring of diabetic patients.
    Solnica B; Naskalski JW; Sieradzki J
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 May; 331(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 12691861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new, improved test system for rapid measurement of blood glucose.
    Hunt JA; Alojado NC
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1989 Jun; 7(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 2752890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.