These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. An in vitro comparison of root canal content extrusion using ultrasonic and hand instrumentation. Lee SJ; Lee CS; Strittmatter EJ Endod Dent Traumatol; 1991 Apr; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 1782896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Today's sonics: using the combined hand/sonic endodontic technique. Zakariasen KL; Zakariasen KA; McMinn MM J Am Dent Assoc; 1992 Oct; 123(10):67-78. PubMed ID: 1401595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative gravimetric analysis of the drilling capacity of sonic vibrating instruments]. Carli PO; Favero GA; Longhin D; Morello M G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 2485793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic appliances on root canal debridement]. Chen CP; Yeh CL; Yang YK; Ma CC; Nieh S Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Jun; 9(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 2104285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals. Walker TL; del Rio CE J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacteriologic status of the root canal after sonic, ultrasonic and hand instrumentation. Barnett F; Trope M; Khoja M; Tronstad L Endod Dent Traumatol; 1985 Dec; 1(6):228-31. PubMed ID: 3867506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Shape of the root canal after ultrasonic instrumentation with K-Flex files. Ahmad M Endod Dent Traumatol; 1990 Jun; 6(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 2079012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of sonic versus ultrasonic instrumentation on canal preparation. Yahya AS; ElDeeb ME J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2592876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Streaming patterns produced around endosonic files. Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Laird WR Int Endod J; 1991 Nov; 24(6):290-7. PubMed ID: 1820361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Root canal preparation: comparison of manual, mechanical and ultrasonic instrumentation]. Artese L; Quaranta M; Piattelli A; Scaramella F Zahnarztl Prax; 1991 Sep; 42(9):334-6, 338. PubMed ID: 1816709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on the shape of curved root canals. Tang MP; Stock CJ Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 2599662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison in vitro of two ultrasonic root canal preparation techniques. Yap SY; Stock CJ Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 1306862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of varying the ultrasonic power setting on canal preparation. Walsh CL; Messer HH; ElDeeb ME J Endod; 1990 Jun; 16(6):273-8. PubMed ID: 2074425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inherent variability in the power output of endosonic instruments. Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD Int Endod J; 1991 Nov; 24(6):298-302. PubMed ID: 1820362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of precurving on the performance of endosonic K files. Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD J Endod; 1992 May; 18(5):232-6. PubMed ID: 1402578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The vibratory pattern of ultrasonic files driven piezoelectrically. Ahmad M; Roy RA; Kamarudin AG; Safar M Int Endod J; 1993 Mar; 26(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 8330934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]