These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8270382)

  • 21. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study.
    George S; Kuriakose S; Jayalatha NS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of an adhesive system for amalgam repair: bond strength and porosity.
    Nuckles DB; Draughn RA; Smith TI
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Dec; 25(12):829-33. PubMed ID: 7568691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single-bottle primer/adhesive systems.
    Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):222-6. PubMed ID: 10649912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jan; 28(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10332355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The marginal leakage of amalgam and Vitrebond restorations after an occlusal load test].
    Toschi E; Ruggeri O; Semprini P; Montanari MC; Prati C
    Minerva Stomatol; 1993; 42(11-12):487-90. PubMed ID: 8164623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD; Vance RI
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of composite resin to amalgam.
    Ozcan M; Koolman C; Aladag A; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 21740243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Amalgam repair: a case report.
    Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Andrada MA
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Aug; 23(8):527-31. PubMed ID: 1410255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.