These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8270453)
1. Importance of in vivo dosimetry as part of a quality assurance program in tangential breast treatments. Leunens G; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; Van der Schueren E Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Jan; 28(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 8270453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance by systematic in vivo dosimetry: results on a large cohort of patients. Fiorino C; Corletto D; Mangili P; Broggi S; Bonini A; Cattaneo GM; Parisi R; Rosso A; Signorotto P; Villa E; Calandrino R Radiother Oncol; 2000 Jul; 56(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 10869759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo dosimetry for tangential breast irradiation: role of the equipment in the accuracy of dose delivery. Leunens G; Verstraete J; van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E Radiother Oncol; 1991 Dec; 22(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 1792322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assurance in radiation oncology. A study of feasibility and impact on action levels of an in vivo dosimetry program during breast cancer irradiation. Cozzi L; Fogliata-Cozzi A Radiother Oncol; 1998 Apr; 47(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9632289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The implementation of in vivo dosimetry in a small radiotherapy department. Voordeckers M; Goossens H; Rutten J; Van den Bogaert W Radiother Oncol; 1998 Apr; 47(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9632291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. 1. Entrance dose measurements, a reliable procedure. Leunens G; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E Radiother Oncol; 1990 Feb; 17(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 2320746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of errors in individual patients in radiotherapy by systematic in vivo dosimetry. Noel A; Aletti P; Bey P; Malissard L Radiother Oncol; 1995 Feb; 34(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 7597213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is it necessary to repeat quality control procedures for head and neck patients? Mitine C; Leunens G; Verstraete J; Blanckaert N; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E Radiother Oncol; 1991 Jul; 21(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 1924856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo dosimetry with diodes in a radiotherapy department in Pakistan. Tunio M; Rafi M; Ali S; Ahmed Z; Zameer A; Hashmi A; Maqbool SA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 21199828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasible measurement errors when undertaking in vivo dosimetry during external beam radiotherapy of the breast. Herbert CE; Ebert MA; Joseph DJ Med Dosim; 2003; 28(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 12747619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of quality assurance for intensity- modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): sequential tomotherapy. Woo SY; Grant W; McGary JE; Teh BS; Butler EB Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):274-86. PubMed ID: 12694849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast treatment: a national dosimetry intercomparison. van Bree NA; van Battum LJ; Huizenga H; Mijnheer BJ Radiother Oncol; 1991 Dec; 22(4):252-60. PubMed ID: 1792317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Swiss cheese error detection method for real-time EPID-based quality assurance and error prevention. Passarge M; Fix MK; Manser P; Stampanoni MF; Siebers JV Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1212-1223. PubMed ID: 28134989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate in vivo dosimetry of a randomized trial of prostate cancer irradiation. Meijer GJ; Minken AW; van Ingen KM; Smulders B; Uiterwaal H; Mijnheer BJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Apr; 49(5):1409-18. PubMed ID: 11286849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assurance of serial tomotherapy for head and neck patient treatments. Low DA; Chao KS; Mutic S; Gerber RL; Perez CA; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Oct; 42(3):681-92. PubMed ID: 9806530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of in vivo thermoluminescent dosimeters in the quality assurance programme for the START breast fractionation trial. Venables K; Miles EA; Aird EG; Hoskin PJ; Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jun; 71(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 15172146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast with tangential fields. Cheng CW; Das IJ; Tang W; Chang S; Tsai JS; Ceberg C; De Gaspie B; Singh R; Fein DA; Fowble B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):835-42. PubMed ID: 9240653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer. Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation therapy of breast carcinoma: confirmation of prescription dose using diodes. Yaparpalvi R; Fontenla DP; Yu L; Lai PP; Vikram B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Apr; 35(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 8641916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two different EPID-based solutions performing pretreatment quality assurance: 2D portal dosimetry versus 3D forward projection method. Bresciani S; Poli M; Miranti A; Maggio A; Di Dia A; Bracco C; Gabriele P; Stasi M Phys Med; 2018 Aug; 52():65-71. PubMed ID: 30139611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]