These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8271032)

  • 1. NBTF hopefuls scramble for DOE grant.
    Miller L
    J Nucl Med; 1994 Jan; 35(1):12N-14N. PubMed ID: 8271032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DOE approves grant for NBTF (National Biomedical Tracer Facility) feasibility study.
    Ghosh PR
    J Nucl Med; 1991 Mar; 32(3):17N-18N, 27N. PubMed ID: 2005442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. science funding. DOE cures pork project with peer review.
    Kintisch E
    Science; 2007 May; 316(5825):674. PubMed ID: 17478687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidentiality of research grant protocols.
    Morgan TE; Keyes JA; Sherman JF
    Clin Res; 1976 Jan; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10277868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do Public Health Service agencies do with grant proposals?
    Willette RE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 10313840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obtaining grant funding: ten steps to success.
    Gelatt JP
    ASHA; 1989 Feb; 31(2):67-9. PubMed ID: 2645881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer grant policy comes under fire.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):113. PubMed ID: 8774873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does a study section look for in evaluating a grant proposal?
    Buckley JP
    Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 10236661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DOE announces 20-year science facility plan.
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45(1):17N. PubMed ID: 14734663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rescuing the grant monies.
    Freeman A
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1970 May; 156(10):1375-6. PubMed ID: 5445790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Institutes of Health implements electronic grant submission.
    J Investig Med; 2007 Jan; 55(1):9. PubMed ID: 17443943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize.
    Berg JM
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18276870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to keep your grant application from being laughed at by the government.
    Duggan DD
    Grants Mag; 1982 Jun; 5(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10258685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecology. Savannah River Lab to close after DOE cuts its funding.
    Kintisch E
    Science; 2007 May; 316(5827):969. PubMed ID: 17510335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Response.
    Capecchi MR
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18283726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific community. 'Security breach' leaks NIH grant applications onto Web.
    Grimm D
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5748):598. PubMed ID: 16254153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.