These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8271229)

  • 1. Gender difference in mate preference among law students: divergence and convergence of criteria.
    Townsend JM; Roberts LW
    J Psychol; 1993 Sep; 127(5):507-28. PubMed ID: 8271229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection.
    Townsend JM; Levy GD
    Arch Sex Behav; 1990 Apr; 19(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 2337380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
    Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perception of sexual attractiveness: sex differences in variability.
    Townsend JM; Wasserman T
    Arch Sex Behav; 1997 Jun; 26(3):243-68. PubMed ID: 9146813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings.
    Dunn MJ; Searle R
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19302732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex, drugs, relationships, contraception, and fears of disease on a college campus over 17 years.
    Murstein BI; Mercy T
    Adolescence; 1994; 29(114):303-22. PubMed ID: 8085483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond initial attraction: physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage.
    McNulty JK; Neff LA; Karney BR
    J Fam Psychol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 18266540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual hookups among college students: sex differences in emotional reactions.
    Townsend JM; Wasserman TH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 21975920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Theory of Planned Behavior to explain intention to engage in premarital sex amongst Korean college students: a questionnaire survey.
    Cha ES; Doswell WM; Kim KH; Charron-Prochownik D; Patrick TE
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Sep; 44(7):1147-57. PubMed ID: 16814789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Romantic partners in a market perspective: expectations about what ensures a highly desirable partner.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; Yamamoto ME; Lopes FA
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Oct; 113(2):605-18. PubMed ID: 24597452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On living together without marriage.
    Arafat I; Yorburg B
    J Sex Res; 1973 May; 9(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 4806764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interracial dating: attitudes and experience among American college students in California.
    Fiebert MS; Karamol H; Kasdan M
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1059-64. PubMed ID: 11272744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the function of exchange in couples of similar and differing physical attractiveness.
    Murstein BI; Reif JA; Syracuse-Siewert G
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Aug; 91(1):299-314. PubMed ID: 12353796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dating relationships in college students with childhood-onset asthma.
    Eddington AR; Mullins LL; Fedele DA; Ryan JL; Junghans AN
    J Asthma; 2010 Feb; 47(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 20100015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender, social background and sexual attitudes among Chinese students.
    Higgins LT; Sun C
    Cult Health Sex; 2007; 9(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17364712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes toward marriage and premarital sexual activity of college freshmen.
    Salts CJ; Seismore MD; Lindholm BW; Smith TA
    Adolescence; 1994; 29(116):775-9. PubMed ID: 7892790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.