These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8271914)

  • 21. The use of low dose 1.5 mg prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor at term with unfavorable cervix.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Nov; 78(11):590-5. PubMed ID: 8576669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Tenore JL
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Double-blind comparison of 2.5 and 5.0 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Smith CV; Miller A; Livezey GT
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 8913976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Rouben D; Arias F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Buser D; Mora G; Arias F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 9083316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sweeping of membranes vs. intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening. Randomized trial.
    Gemer O; Kapustian V; Harari D; Sassoon E; Segal S
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):706-8. PubMed ID: 11547642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) in the preinduction and induction of labor.
    Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Laskowska M; Oleszczuk J
    Med Sci Monit; 2001; 7(5):1023-8. PubMed ID: 11535953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Criteria for use of dinoprostone intracervical gel for cervical ripening.
    Mancano MA
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1995 Mar; 52(6):646-7. PubMed ID: 7606580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Votipka JR
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jul; 45(1):20. PubMed ID: 9228905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Hod M; Ben-Haroush A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18158629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2: influence on psychomotor evolution in the first year.
    Van Pelt C; De Coster W; Thiery M; Parewijck W; De Baere C; Verbraeken B; Derom R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1984 Dec; 18(5-6):299-301. PubMed ID: 6597115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Current trends in cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Harman JH; Kim A
    Am Fam Physician; 1999 Aug; 60(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 10465223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Ripening of the human cervix].
    Li WJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jan; 20(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3156731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin.
    Tam WH; Tai SM; Rogers MS
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Nov; 78(10):861-5. PubMed ID: 10577614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Inducing labor applying intra-cervical prostaglandin E vaginal tablets].
    Minkov R; Popova A; Kovachev E; Tsvetkova S; Protopopov F; Pencheva M
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2002; 41 Suppl 2():13-5. PubMed ID: 19708188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
    Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cervical maturation and induction of labor with PgE2 gel. Authors' experience].
    Carta G; Vigilante M; Di Cesare S; Mascaretti G; Caserta D; Moscarini M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Oct; 49(10):427-32. PubMed ID: 9463175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.