These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8272436)

  • 1. Towards a protocol for measurement of maximum spatial peak temporal average acoustic intensity from diagnostic B mode ultrasound scanners in the field.
    Henderson J; Jago JR; Willson K; Whittingham TA
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Nov; 38(11):1611-21. PubMed ID: 8272436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound equipment in current clinical use.
    Henderson J; Willson K; Jago JR; Whittingham TA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 8525560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measured acoustic intensities for clinical diagnostic ultrasound transducers and correlation with thermal index.
    Retz K; Kotopoulis S; Kiserud T; Matre K; Eide GE; Sande R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):236-241. PubMed ID: 27608142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of unscanned-mode soft-tissue thermal index for rectangular sources and proposed new indices.
    O'Brien WD; Yang Y; Simpson DG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):965-72. PubMed ID: 15313328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intercomparison of acoustic output measurements of a diagnostic ultrasound device.
    Beissner K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 May; 25(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 10386739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two methods for determining ultrasonic intensity for medical transducers.
    Shombert DG; Robinson RA
    Ultrasonics; 1983 Sep; 21(5):234-6. PubMed ID: 6612895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic field characterization of a clinical magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system inside the magnet bore.
    Kothapalli SVVN; Altman MB; Partanen A; Wan L; Gach HM; Straube W; Hallahan DE; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 28626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of the acoustic output of ultrasonic Doppler equipment.
    Duck FA; Starritt HC; Anderson SP
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1987 Feb; 8(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 3555969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of the audio sound generated by ultrasound imaging systems.
    Fatemi M; Alizad A; Greenleaf JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1448-55. PubMed ID: 15807032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the conditions for measurement of spatial-peak temporal-averaged intensity in scanned ultrasound beams.
    Dixon KL; Duck FA
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):968-71. PubMed ID: 10195013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of ultrasound scanners by acoustic signal injection.
    Duggan TC; Sik MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():179-84. PubMed ID: 6400237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the Acoustic Output of an Ultrasonic Propulsion Device for Urinary Stones.
    Cunitz BW; Dunmire B; Bailey MR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Dec; 64(12):1818-1827. PubMed ID: 28981413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of Temperature Rise within the Lens of the Porcine Eye Caused by Ultrasound Insonation.
    King RL; Liu Y; Harris GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):476-481. PubMed ID: 27817969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How reliable are manufacturer's reported acoustic output data?
    Jago JR; Henderson J; Whittingham TA; Willson K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(1):135-6. PubMed ID: 7754574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in diagnostic ultrasound exposure.
    Duck FA; Martin K
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Nov; 36(11):1423-32. PubMed ID: 1754612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditionally Increased Acoustic Pressures in Nonfetal Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations Without Contrast Agents: A Preliminary Assessment.
    Nightingale KR; Church CC; Harris G; Wear KA; Bailey MR; Carson PL; Jiang H; Sandstrom KL; Szabo TL; Ziskin MC
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jul; 34(7):1-41. PubMed ID: 26112617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear propagation and the output indices.
    Carstensen EL; Dalecki D; Gracewski SM; Christopher T
    J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 9952082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An exposimetry system using tissue-mimicking liquid.
    Stiles TA; Madsen EL; Frank GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 17720296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurements, phantoms, and standardization.
    Zeqiri B; Hodnett M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(2):375-91. PubMed ID: 20349825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.