These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Development of an example flow test object and comparison of five of these test objects, constructed in various laboratories. Teirlinck CJ; Bezemer RA; Kollmann C; Lubbers J; Hoskins PR; Ramnarine KV; Fish P; Fredeldt KE; Schaarschmidt UG Ultrasonics; 1998 Feb; 36(1-5):653-60. PubMed ID: 9651595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners. Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 15588958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices. Browne JE Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):742-51. PubMed ID: 25212384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance tests of Doppler ultrasound equipment with a string phantom. Goldstein A J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Mar; 10(3):125-39. PubMed ID: 2027183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of moving target for a string phantom: II. On the performance testing of Doppler ultrasound systems. Hoskins PR Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(8):781-9. PubMed ID: 7863567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean? Nelson TR; Pretorius DH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 2970215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposed standard thermal test object for medical ultrasound. Shaw A; Pay NM; Preston RC; Bond AD Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jan; 25(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 10048809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A test object for quality control of the instrument for doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, based on the Draft IEC 61685 Standard]. Kollmann C; Bezemer RA; Fredfeldt KE; Schaarschmidt UG; Teirlinck CJ Ultraschall Med; 1999 Dec; 20(6):248-57. PubMed ID: 10670070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound equipment in current clinical use. Henderson J; Willson K; Jago JR; Whittingham TA Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 8525560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria and scheduling of quality control of B-mode and doppler ultrasonography equipment. Balbis S; Meloni T; Tofani S; Zenone F; Nucera D; Guiot C J Clin Ultrasound; 2012; 40(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 22359401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The leicester Doppler phantom--a digital electronic phantom for ultrasound pulsed Doppler system testing. Gittins J; Martin K Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):647-55. PubMed ID: 20350689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New class of pulsed Doppler US ambiguity at short ranges. Gill RW; Kossoff MB; Kossoff G; Griffiths KA Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):272-5. PubMed ID: 2675187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An audit of a hospital-based Doppler ultrasound quality control protocol using a commercial string Doppler phantom. Cournane S; Fagan AJ; Browne JE Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 24156827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of tank liquid acoustic velocity on Doppler string phantom measurements. Goldstein A J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Mar; 10(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 2027185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]