These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8272470)

  • 21. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gender-based measurement invariance of the substance use risk profile scale.
    Memetovic J; Ratner PA; Richardson CG
    Addict Behav; 2014 Mar; 39(3):690-4. PubMed ID: 24296151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing item response theory invariance of the standardized Quality-of-life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS(®)) in acute coronary syndrome patients: differential functioning of items and test.
    Deng N; Anatchkova MD; Waring ME; Han KT; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1809-22. PubMed ID: 25601166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. LC-PROM: Validation of a patient reported outcomes measure for liver cirrhosis patients.
    Zhang Y; Yang Y; Lv J; Zhang Y
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 May; 14():75. PubMed ID: 27165036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?
    Facteau JD; Craig SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 11393435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement invariance of English and French Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) empowerment scales validated for cancer.
    Brunet J; Lauzier S; Campbell HS; Fillion L; Osborne RH; Maunsell E
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2375-84. PubMed ID: 25814473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing stress in patients seeking treatment.
    Sobral MP; Costa ME; Schmidt L; Martins MV
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):375-382. PubMed ID: 27979919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Item response theory and clinical measurement.
    Reise SP; Waller NG
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2009; 5():27-48. PubMed ID: 18976138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement invariance testing of the PHQ-9 in a multi-ethnic population in Europe: the HELIUS study.
    Galenkamp H; Stronks K; Snijder MB; Derks EM
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Oct; 17(1):349. PubMed ID: 29065874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.
    Lee KL; Tsai SL; Chiu YT; Ho MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May; 21(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 26387118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-Level Group Measurement Invariance When Groups Are at Different Levels of Multilevel Data.
    Kim ES; Wang Y; Kiefer SM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Dec; 78(6):973-997. PubMed ID: 30559511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement invariance across educational levels and gender in 12-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) on caregivers of people with dementia.
    Lin CY; Ku LE; Pakpour AH
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1841-1848. PubMed ID: 28760167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.
    Safrit MJ; Cohen AS; Costa MG
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Toward a hierarchical model of criminal thinking: evidence from item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Walters GD; Hagman BT; Cohn AM
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):925-36. PubMed ID: 21707187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples.
    Meganck R; Vanheule S; Desmet M
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 18258730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.
    Meade AW; Wright NA
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Sep; 97(5):1016-31. PubMed ID: 22468848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: an examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks.
    Zhao Y
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Mar; 26(3):555-564. PubMed ID: 27909853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.