These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations. Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of four adhesive materials in the treatment of cervical lesions. Negri P Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Jun; 48(6 Suppl 1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10549220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Marginal leakage of composite resin and glass ionomer]. Kfouri Lopes Mda G; Stroparo FM; Beltrami E; Stroparo CM; Segala AD Dens (Curitiba); 1989; 5(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 2490127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation. Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Beznos C Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Wibowo G; Stockton L Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]