These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8272493)

  • 1. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):240-4. PubMed ID: 1299247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of four adhesive materials in the treatment of cervical lesions.
    Negri P
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Jun; 48(6 Suppl 1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10549220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Marginal leakage of composite resin and glass ionomer].
    Kfouri Lopes Mda G; Stroparo FM; Beltrami E; Stroparo CM; Segala AD
    Dens (Curitiba); 1989; 5(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 2490127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glass ionomer restoratives.
    Berry EA
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1993; 72(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 8040719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
    Beznos C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
    Wibowo G; Stockton L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.