122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8272541)
1. [Angiography with magnetic resonance of the ++carotid arteries. Evaluation of clinical results obtained with low magnetic field equipment].
Pavone P; Catalano C; Di Girolamo M; Albertini Petroni G; Marsili L; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 8272541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [MR angiography of the carotid arteries using 3D TOF technique with sagittal double-volume acquisition using a new head-neck coil].
Link J; Brinkmann G; Steffens JC; Graessner J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Heller M
Rofo; 1996 Dec; 165(6):544-50. PubMed ID: 9026096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
Spartera C; Morettini G; Marino G; Marsili L; Di Cesare E; La Barbera G; Petrassi C; Ventura M
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance angiography of extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries, including their origins: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Furuya Y; Isoda H; Hasegawa S; Takahashi M; Kaneko M; Uemura K
Neuroradiology; 1992; 35(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 1289737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Carotid angiography by magnetic resonance].
Friedrich JM; Nöldecke HA; Tomczak R; Merkle E; Orend KH
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1993 Oct; 42(8):69-75. PubMed ID: 8122855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens.
Fellner C; Lang W; Janka R; Wutke R; Bautz W; Fellner FA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 15779039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid bifurcation imaging: magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional angiography and Doppler ultrasound.
Buijs PC; Klop RB; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP; Bakker CJ; Beek FJ; van Gils AP; Dillon EH; Ramos LM
Eur J Vasc Surg; 1993 May; 7(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 8513902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR angiography in carotid stenosis: a comparison of three techniques.
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Magarelli N; Florio F; Giannatempo GM; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 28(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 9788013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries].
Hebrang A; Brinar V; Vidjak V; Grga A; Sarlija M; Sosa T; Tomac S; Drasković J
Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blinded-reader comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis.
Mittl RL; Broderick M; Carpenter JP; Goldberg HI; Listerud J; Mishkin MM; Berkowitz HD; Atlas SW
Stroke; 1994 Jan; 25(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 8266380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
Vogl TJ; Kutter RW; Schön K; Juergens M; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Steger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Remonda L; Senn P; Barth A; Arnold M; Lövblad KO; Schroth G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11847044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; van der Lugt A; Bartels LW; Mali WP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance angiography in stenosing-occlusive diseases of the carotid arteries: 3D with time of flight versus 3D with phase contrast].
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Magarelli N; Nemore F; Florio F; D'Angelo V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 1997 Mar; 93(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 9221412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
