These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8273464)

  • 1. Is the round-window electrical test possible in children?
    Truy E; Morgon A; Collet L; Chanal JM; Jonas AM; Girard J; Berger-Vachon C
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():114-9. PubMed ID: 8273464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brain stem response evoked by electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant.
    Brown CD; Antognelli T; Gibson WP
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():125-9. PubMed ID: 8273466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Test of electrical stimulation of the round window. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the rehabilitation of total deafness by cochlear implant].
    Chouard CH; Koca E; Meyer B; Jacquier I
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 7825941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Establishment and rudimentary application of the method of recording auditory brainstem responses electrically stimulated via round-window niche in cochlear implants].
    Cheng JN; Cao KL; Wei CG; Yang LJ; Luan L; Li H; Li Y; Zhang QH
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 43(9):653-9. PubMed ID: 19035257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Round window versus promontory stimulation: assessment for cochlear implant candidacy.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):889-92. PubMed ID: 1746821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of unilateral cochlear implant use on contralateral electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses to round window membrane electrical stimulation.
    Zhang JG; Chen L; Li P; Sun JW; Guo XT; Sun JQ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jun; 141(6):588-593. PubMed ID: 33823755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ear canal electrodes versus promontory electrodes in preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection.
    Spies TH; Snik AF; Mens LH; van den Broek P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():108-13. PubMed ID: 8273463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of transtympanic round window electrocochleography for threshold estimations in children.
    Wong SH; Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Am J Otol; 1997 Sep; 18(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 9303161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of the round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness.
    Meyer B; Drira M; Gegu D; Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():168-76. PubMed ID: 6596841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Steady state evoked potentials: a new tool for the accurate assessment of hearing in cochlear implant candidates.
    Rance G; Rickards FW; Cohen LT; Burton MJ; Clark GM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():44-8. PubMed ID: 8273498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea.
    Charlet de Sauvage R; Lima da Costa D; Erre JP; Aran JM
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):119-34. PubMed ID: 9282894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain stem evoked responses by intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Robier A; Lescao Y; Beutter P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():120-4. PubMed ID: 8273465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of round window electrophysiological techniques in the selection of children for cochlear implants.
    Gibson W; Sanli H
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():148-51. PubMed ID: 11892131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experimental study of extracochlear electric stimulation].
    Ni DF
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1992; 27(5):261-4, 318. PubMed ID: 1301761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrocochleography in profoundly deaf children: comparison of promontory and round window techniques.
    Aso S; Gibson WP
    Am J Otol; 1994 May; 15(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 8579143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory brainstem potentials in man evoked by electrical stimulation of the round window.
    Chouard CH; Meyer B; Donadieu F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):287-93. PubMed ID: 443011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative electrical nerve stimulation as one of the criteria for selection.
    Van Dijk JE; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():103-7. PubMed ID: 8273462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():99-103. PubMed ID: 21756591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.