These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8273628)
1. Mammography and malpractice litigation: current status, lessons, and admonitions. Brenner RJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 8273628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening can survive malpractice ... if radiologists take center stage and assume the role of educator. Berlin L Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):641-4. PubMed ID: 15564402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography and malpractice. Potchen EJ; Bisesi MA; Sierra AE; Potchen JE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 1741799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography malpractice litigation and the impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act). Whiteman T Adm Radiol; 1995 Mar; 14(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 10142158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases. Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Pitfalls of Rendering an Expert Opinion in Breast Malpractice Cases by Reviewing a CD-ROM. Brenner RJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Apr; 13(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 26768543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a radiologist be compelled to testify as an expert witness? Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15972395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast imaging, standard of care, and the expert. Homer MJ Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):963-74, viii. PubMed ID: 15337428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malpractice issues in radiology. American College of Radiology Standard for Communication. Cascade PN; Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1439-42. PubMed ID: 10584778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Be careful to not willingly suspend disbelief. Kopans DB Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):645-7. PubMed ID: 15564403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiology and the law, with an emphasis on interventional radiology. vanSonnenberg E; Barton JB; Wittich GR Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 8475261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mala praxis: a study of malpractice claims and litigation in the field of radiology. Irish J Radiol Manage; 2008; 30(4):34-9; quiz 41-3. PubMed ID: 18714758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Missed mammographic abnormalities, malpractice, and expert witnesses: does majority rule in the courtroom? Berlin L Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):288; author reply 289. PubMed ID: 14519882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Expert witness blinding strategies to mitigate bias in radiology malpractice cases: a comprehensive review of the literature. Durand DJ; Robertson CT; Agarwal G; Duszak R; Krupinski EA; Itri JN; Fotenos A; Savoie B; Ding A; Lewin JS J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):868-73. PubMed ID: 25041992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MEDICOLEGAL: Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: reinterpreting outside mammograms prior to breast biopsy. Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):W325. PubMed ID: 23436879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The miasmatic expert witness. Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12818825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Holding expert witnesses accountable for their actions and opinions. Ramseyer L J Okla State Med Assoc; 2004 Apr; 97(4):152. PubMed ID: 15141768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]