222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8273700)
1. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy.
Broderick LS; Turner DA; Renfrew DL; Schnitzer TJ; Huff JP; Harris C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 8273700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression.
Sonin AH; Pensy RA; Mulligan ME; Hatem S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12388492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast spin-echo MR of the articular cartilage in the osteoarthrotic knee. Correlation of MR and arthroscopic findings.
Kawahara Y; Uetani M; Nakahara N; Doiguchi Y; Nishiguchi M; Futagawa S; Kinoshita Y; Hayashi K
Acta Radiol; 1998 Mar; 39(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 9529440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-point Dixon chemical-shift imaging for evaluating articular cartilage defects in the knee joint on a low-field-strength open magnet.
Bredella MA; Losasso C; Moelleken SC; Huegli RW; Genant HK; Tirman PF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1371-5. PubMed ID: 11717086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M
Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritic knees.
Drapé JL; Pessis E; Auleley GR; Chevrot A; Dougados M; Ayral X
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 9646792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR in the study of knee cartilage pathologies: influence of location and grade on the effectiveness of the method.
Macarini L; Murrone M; Marini S; Mariano M; Zaccheo N; Moretti B
Radiol Med; 2003 Apr; 105(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 12835623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subchondral bone marrow edema in patients with degeneration of the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
Kijowski R; Stanton P; Fine J; De Smet A
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):943-9. PubMed ID: 16424243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arthroscopic evaluation of knee articular cartilage: a comparison with plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging.
Blackburn WD; Bernreuter WK; Rominger M; Loose LL
J Rheumatol; 1994 Apr; 21(4):675-9. PubMed ID: 8035392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
