These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8274111)

  • 1. Clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging and ancillary testing. Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Study Group.
    Giang DW; Grow VM; Mooney C; Mushlin AI; Goodman AD; Mattson DH; Schiffer RB
    Arch Neurol; 1994 Jan; 51(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 8274111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. The Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Group.
    Mushlin AI; Detsky AS; Phelps CE; O'Connor PW; Kido DK; Kucharczyk W; Giang DW; Mooney C; Tansey CM; Hall WJ
    JAMA; 1993 Jun 23-30; 269(24):3146-51. PubMed ID: 8505818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of test result sequencing in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.
    O'Connor P; Tansey C; Kucharczyk W; Detsky AS
    Arch Neurol; 1994 Jan; 51(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8274110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Kirshner HS; Tsai SI; Runge VM; Price AC
    Arch Neurol; 1985 Sep; 42(9):859-63. PubMed ID: 4026629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a prospective 2-year follow-up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT.
    Lee KH; Hashimoto SA; Hooge JP; Kastrukoff LF; Oger JJ; Li DK; Paty DW
    Neurology; 1991 May; 41(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 2027480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perils and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.
    Schiffer RB; Giang DW; Mushlin A; Ketonen L; Joy S; Kido D; Goodman AD; Mattson DH; Mooney C
    J Neuroimaging; 1993 Apr; 3(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10148526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
    Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Giesser BS; Kurtzberg D; Vaughan HG; Arezzo JC; Aisen ML; Smith CR; LaRocca NG; Scheinberg LC
    Arch Neurol; 1987 Mar; 44(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 3827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Definite and suspected multiple sclerosis in children: long-term follow-up and magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Belopitova L; Guergueltcheva PV; Bojinova V
    J Child Neurol; 2001 May; 16(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 11392515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
    David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients.
    Lebrun C; Bensa C; Debouverie M; Wiertlevski S; Brassat D; de Seze J; Rumbach L; Pelletier J; Labauge P; Brochet B; Tourbah A; Clavelou P;
    Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT.
    Paty DW; Oger JJ; Kastrukoff LF; Hashimoto SA; Hooge JP; Eisen AA; Eisen KA; Purves SJ; Low MD; Brandejs V
    Neurology; 1988 Feb; 38(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 3340277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other instrumental examinations.
    Rumbach L; Collard M; Warter JM; Marescaux C; Armspach JP; Gounot D; Chambron J
    Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():125-8. PubMed ID: 3654174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.
    Mushlin AI; Mooney C; Grow V; Phelps CE
    Arch Neurol; 1994 Jan; 51(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 8274112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between multimodal evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.
    Comi G; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Filippi M; Canal N; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A
    J Neurol; 1989 Jan; 236(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 2915225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurological manifestations of connective tissue diseases mimicking multiple sclerosis.
    Pelidou SH; Giannopoulos S; Tzavidi S; Tsifetaki N; Kitsos G; Stefanou D; Kostadima V; Drosos AA; Kyritsis AP
    Rheumatol Int; 2007 Nov; 28(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 17571265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple sclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging, evoked responses, and spinal fluid electrophoresis.
    Farlow MR; Markand ON; Edwards MK; Stevens JC; Kolar OJ
    Neurology; 1986 Jun; 36(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 3703290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients.
    Sheldon JJ; Siddharthan R; Tobias J; Sheremata WA; Soila K; Viamonte M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 3876753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other paraclinical examinations.
    Rumbach L; Warter JM; Marescaux C; Gounot D; Chambron J; Collard M
    Eur Neurol; 1987; 27(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3622587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients.
    Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G
    Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.