129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8275416)
21. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix.
Gustafsson L; Sparén P; Gustafsson M; Wilander E; Bergström R; Adami HO
Br J Cancer; 1995 Aug; 72(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 7640239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980.
Pettersson F; Björkholm E; Näslund I
Int J Epidemiol; 1985 Dec; 14(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 4086138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Progress in the early detection of cervix cancer from the viewpoint of the Saarland cancer register].
Brenner H; Wiebelt H; Ziegler H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 2358181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Association between cervical screening and prevention of invasive cervical cancer in Ontario: a population-based case-control study.
Vicus D; Sutradhar R; Lu Y; Kupets R; Paszat L;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 25377725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Survival and prognosis of women with invasive cervical cancer according to age.
Brun JL; Stoven-Camou D; Trouette R; Lopez M; Chene G; Hocké C
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 91(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 14599872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increase of cervical cancer incidence in Sweden in relation to screening history: population cohort study.
Wang J; Andrae B; Strander B; Sparén P; Dillner J
Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):988-993. PubMed ID: 32421420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Mass screening in Sweden for cancer of the uterine cervix: effect on incidence and mortality. An overview.
Kjellgren O
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 3770533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stage at diagnosis and mortality in patients with adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix diagnosed as a consequence of cytologic screening.
Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Hiatt RA
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12685183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening based on a mathematical screening model using data from the Hiroshima Prefecture Cancer Registry.
Ito K; Tsunematsu M; Satoh K; Kakehashi M; Nagata Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(8):4897-902. PubMed ID: 24083688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening History Among Women with Invasive Cervical Cancer in an Academic Medical Center: Will We Miss Cancers Following Updated Guidelines?
Nitschmann C; May T; Mirkovic J; Feldman S
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Aug; 25(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 26859535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The accuracy of the causes of death and the estimated trend: the case of cervix uteri].
Mancuso P; Sacchettini C; Vicentini M; Caroli S; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(3-4):157-63. PubMed ID: 27436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Uterine cervical carcinoma in Connecticut, 1935-1973: evidence for two classes of invasive disease.
Laskey PW; Meigs JW; Flannery JT
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1976 Nov; 57(5):1037-43. PubMed ID: 1003540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Carcinoma of the cervix in Southwestern American indians: results of a cytologic detection program.
Jordan SW; Key CR
Cancer; 1981 May; 47(10):2523-32. PubMed ID: 7272903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Trends in incidence of and mortality from invasive cancer of the uterine cervix in Scotland (1975-1994).
Walker JJ; Brewster D; Gould A; Raab GM
Public Health; 1998 Nov; 112(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 9883033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
