These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8275796)

  • 1. Sensitivity to dopamine blocking in rat licking behavior: function of taste stimuli, response difficulty, and response measures.
    Hsiao S; Chen BH; Chai SC
    Chin J Physiol; 1993; 36(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 8275796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anticipatory contrast effect in rats: a new view with lick response analysis and the effect of dopamine blocking.
    Chen BH; Hsiao S
    Chin J Physiol; 1996; 39(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 9058008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex response competition and dopamine blocking: choosing of high cost sucrose solution versus low cost water in rats.
    Hsiao S; Chen BH
    Chin J Physiol; 1995; 38(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8697904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pimozide does not shift palatability: separation of anhedonia from sensorimotor suppression by taste reactivity.
    Peciña S; Berridge KC; Parker LA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Nov; 58(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 9329075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additivity of taste-specific effects of sucrose and quinine: microstructural analysis of ingestive behavior in rats.
    Hsiao S; Fan RJ
    Behav Neurosci; 1993 Apr; 107(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 8484896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of pimozide on the consumption of a palatable saccharin-glucose solution in the rat.
    Xenakis S; Sclafani A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Sep; 15(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 7291247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopamine D(2) receptors and ingestive behavior: brainstem mediates inhibition of intraoral intake and accumbens mediates aversive taste behavior in male rats.
    Sederholm F; Johnson AE; Brodin U; Södersten P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 11875634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dopaminergic mediation of a sweet reward in normal and VMH hyperphagic rats.
    Xenakis S; Sclafani A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Feb; 16(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 6951206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in sucrose and quinine taste reactivity patterns in infant rat pups after exposure to the other tastant.
    Suárez AB; Ifrán MC; Pautassi RM; Kamenetzky GV
    Appetite; 2017 Jul; 114():259-264. PubMed ID: 28363812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The inhibitory potency of SCH 23390 and raclopride on licking for sucrose increases across brief-access tests.
    Smith GP; Smith JC
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Oct; 101(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 20515702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of pimozide on the hedonic properties of sucrose: analysis by the taste reactivity test.
    Leeb K; Parker L; Eikelboom R
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1991 Aug; 39(4):895-901. PubMed ID: 1763109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of taste familiarity on intake and taste reactivity in infant rats.
    Diaz-Cenzano E; Chotro MG
    Dev Psychobiol; 2010 Mar; 52(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 20014225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconditioned oromotor taste reactivity elicited by sucrose and quinine is unaffected by extensive bilateral damage to the gustatory zone of the insular cortex in rats.
    King CT; Hashimoto K; Blonde GD; Spector AC
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1599():9-19. PubMed ID: 25536305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amphetamine-induced modification of quinine palatability: analysis by the taste reactivity test.
    Parker L; Leeb K
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Mar; 47(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 8208759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parabrachial gustatory neural activity during licking by rats.
    Nishijo H; Norgren R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Sep; 66(3):974-85. PubMed ID: 1753297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ontogeny of feeding in rats: IV. Taste development as measured by intake and behavioral responses to oral infusions of sucrose and quinine.
    Hall WG; Bryan TE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1981 Apr; 95(2):240-51. PubMed ID: 7229159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some effects of pimozide and of shifts in sucrose concentration on lick rate, duration, and interlick interval.
    Gramling SE; Fowler SC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Jul; 25(1):219-22. PubMed ID: 3749229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hedonic reactivity to sucrose in rats: modification by pimozide.
    Bailey CS; Hsiao S; King JE
    Physiol Behav; 1986 Oct; 38(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 3823157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taste responses of cortical neurons in freely ingesting rats.
    Yamamoto T; Matsuo R; Kiyomitsu Y; Kitamura R
    J Neurophysiol; 1989 Jun; 61(6):1244-58. PubMed ID: 2746324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat.
    Geary N; Smith GP
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 May; 22(5):787-90. PubMed ID: 2989944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.