These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8276728)

  • 1. Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: experiment results.
    Xue S; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 8276728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: a model.
    Xue S; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):93-100. PubMed ID: 8647730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.
    He W; Ren T
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1874. PubMed ID: 23695199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions.
    Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):170-7. PubMed ID: 8647740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of acoustic trauma on acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Nakajima HH; Hubbard AE; Mountain DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2603-14. PubMed ID: 10830383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sources of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Zou Y; Zheng J; Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 180(1-2):91-100. PubMed ID: 12782357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.
    He W; Fridberger A; Porsov E; Ren T
    Biophys J; 2010 Jun; 98(11):2497-505. PubMed ID: 20513393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Otoacoustic emission estimates of human basilar membrane impulse response duration and cochlear filter tuning.
    Raufer S; Verhulst S
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():150-160. PubMed ID: 27989947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):151-60. PubMed ID: 7607981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear characteristics of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Nakajima HH; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1998 Aug; 122(1-2):109-18. PubMed ID: 9714579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II: Interactions with external tones.
    Köppl C; Manley GA
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):159-70. PubMed ID: 8150732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in chickens.
    Sun W; Chen L; Salvi RJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 12097720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I: General characteristics.
    Köppl C; Manley GA
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):157-69. PubMed ID: 8113134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 7(4):333-4. PubMed ID: 15034589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of electrical biasing on electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Roddy J; Hubbard AE; Mountain DC; Xue S
    Hear Res; 1994 Mar; 73(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 8188543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustical modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in intact gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):7-16. PubMed ID: 9667426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.
    Charaziak KK; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):641-658. PubMed ID: 34606020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.