212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8278590)
21. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fully complex magnetoencephalography.
Simon JZ; Wang Y
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Nov; 149(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 16026851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements.
Malmivuo J; Suihko V; Eskola H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Mar; 44(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 9216133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Searching for the best model: ambiguity of inverse solutions and application to fetal magnetoencephalography.
Vrba J; Robinson SE; McCubbin J; Lowery CL; Eswaran H; Murphy P; Preissl H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):757-76. PubMed ID: 17228119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Magnetoencephalography, a new function diagnostic method].
Vieth J
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Jun; 15(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 6088213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity.
de Munck JC; Vijn PC; Lopes da Silva FH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):791-804. PubMed ID: 1505993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Clinical application of magnetoencephalography for brain infarction].
Toyoda K; Fujishima M
Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 1995 Dec; 35(12):1588-90. PubMed ID: 8752473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetoencephalography in neurosurgery.
Mäkelä JP; Forss N; Jääskeläinen J; Kirveskari E; Korvenoja A; Paetau R
Neurosurgery; 2006 Sep; 59(3):493-510; discussion 510-1. PubMed ID: 16955031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automated interictal spike detection and source localization in magnetoencephalography using independent components analysis and spatio-temporal clustering.
Ossadtchi A; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Thyerlei D; Sutherling W; Leahy RM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):508-22. PubMed ID: 15036046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Magnetoencephalography: its principles and clinical application].
Takanashi Y
Rinsho Byori; 1993 Nov; 41(11):1191-7. PubMed ID: 8283795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MEG forward problem formulation using equivalent surface current densities.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1210-7. PubMed ID: 16041984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles.
Jerbi K; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Nolte G; Garnero L; Leahy RM
Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):779-93. PubMed ID: 15193607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetoencephalography (MEG).
Ioannides AA
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 489():167-88. PubMed ID: 18839092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Noise-free magnetoencephalography recordings of brain function.
Volegov P; Matlachov A; Mosher J; Espy MA; Kraus RH
Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(10):2117-28. PubMed ID: 15214546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How many channels are needed for MEG?
Vrba J; Robinson SE; McCubbin J
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():99. PubMed ID: 16012656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study.
Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K
Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fetal magnetoencephalography: current progress and trends.
Preissl H; Lowery CL; Eswaran H
Exp Neurol; 2004 Nov; 190 Suppl 1():S28-36. PubMed ID: 15498539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
