These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8278590)

  • 41. Source reconstruction of brain electromagnetic fields--source iteration of minimum norm (SIMN).
    Liang WK; Wang MS
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1301-11. PubMed ID: 19361564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A mesostate-space model for EEG and MEG.
    Daunizeau J; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17761440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Nov; 43(11):1049-61. PubMed ID: 9214823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Measuring MEG closer to the brain: Performance of on-scalp sensor arrays.
    Iivanainen J; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():542-553. PubMed ID: 28007515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hybrid ultra-low-field MRI and magnetoencephalography system based on a commercial whole-head neuromagnetometer.
    Vesanen PT; Nieminen JO; Zevenhoven KC; Dabek J; Parkkonen LT; Zhdanov AV; Luomahaara J; Hassel J; Penttilä J; Simola J; Ahonen AI; Mäkelä JP; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1795-804. PubMed ID: 22807201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Information content with low- vs. high-T(c) SQUID arrays in MEG recordings: the case for high-T(c) SQUID-based MEG.
    Schneiderman JF
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():42-6. PubMed ID: 24184856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components.
    Marhl U; Sander T; Jazbinšek V
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35590874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Note: Unshielded bilateral magnetoencephalography system using two-dimensional gradiometers.
    Seki Y; Kandori A; Ogata K; Miyashita T; Kumagai Y; Ohnuma M; Konaka K; Naritomi H
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 Sep; 81(9):096103. PubMed ID: 20887009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measuring cerebral hemodynamics with a modified magnetoencephalography system.
    Burke BA; Diamond SG
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Dec; 33(12):2079-98. PubMed ID: 23171539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Source stability index: a novel beamforming based localisation metric.
    Hymers M; Prendergast G; Johnson SR; Green GG
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1385-97. PubMed ID: 19800010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Functional 3D localization of cerebrovascular accidents by magnetoencephalography (MEG).
    Vieth J; Kober H; Weise E; Daun A; Moeger A; Friedrich S; Pongratz H
    Neurol Res; 1992; 14(2 Suppl):132-4. PubMed ID: 1355869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Probability-based current dipole localization from biomagnetic fields.
    Scholz B; Schwierz G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Aug; 41(8):735-42. PubMed ID: 7927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimation of hyper-parameters for a hierarchical model of combined cortical and extra-brain current sources in the MEG inverse problem.
    Morishige K; Yoshioka T; Kawawaki D; Hiroe N; Sato MA; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():320-36. PubMed ID: 25034620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Magnetoencephalographic accuracy profiles for the detection of auditory pathway sources.
    Bauer M; Trahms L; Sander T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Apr; 60(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 25490026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Transforming and comparing data between standard SQUID and OPM-MEG systems.
    Marhl U; Jodko-Władzińska A; Brühl R; Sander T; Jazbinšek V
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262669. PubMed ID: 35045107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The dipole density plot (DDP), a technique to show concentrations of dipoles.
    Vieth J; Sack G; Kober H; Friedrich S; Moeger A; Weise E; Daun A
    Physiol Meas; 1993 Nov; 14 Suppl 4A():A41-4. PubMed ID: 8274983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On-scalp MEG sensor localization using magnetic dipole-like coils: A method for highly accurate co-registration.
    Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Andersen LM; Kalabukhov A; Winkler D; Oostenveld R; Lundqvist D; Schneiderman JF
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 212():116686. PubMed ID: 32119981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.