These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8279707)

  • 1. Comparison between cell motion analyser, autosperm, and conventional semen analysis.
    Kamtchouing P; Vermeulen L; Schoonjans F; Comhaire F
    Andrologia; 1993; 25(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 8279707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the semi-automated Autosperm semen analysis system. II. Comparison with conventional method, time-exposure photomicrography, and automated CellSoft system.
    Chan SY; Zhang GH; Leung A; Ng M; Wang C
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Jan; 53(1):120-30. PubMed ID: 2295330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the semi-automated Autosperm semen analysis system. I. Accuracy and comparison with the conventional method and the automated Hamilton-Thorn system.
    Yeung CH; Krüsemann C; Bunn H; Neuwinger J; Nieschlag E
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Jan; 53(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 2295329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided semen analysis: sperm concentration assessment by the Strömberg-Mika system.
    Togni G; Gallicciotti G; Coccia P; Piffaretti-Yanez A; Stamm J; Balerna M
    Andrologia; 1995; 27(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 7755190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted semen analysis: evaluation of method and assessment of the influence of sperm concentration on linear velocity determination.
    Vantman D; Koukoulis G; Dennison L; Zinaman M; Sherins RJ
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Mar; 49(3):510-5. PubMed ID: 3342904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the Sperm Quality Analyzer.
    Johnston RC; Clarke GN; Liu DY; Baker HW
    Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 7720920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a computer-aided semen analysis system with sperm tail detection.
    Wijchman JG; de Wolf BT; Jager S
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Aug; 10(8):2090-5. PubMed ID: 8567847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn 2030 motility analyser for routine semen analysis in an infertility clinic.
    Neuwinger J; Knuth UA; Nieschlag E
    Int J Androl; 1990 Apr; 13(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 2188910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of semen analysis between the two Hamilton-Thorn semen analysers.
    Agarwal A; Ozturk E; Loughlin KR
    Andrologia; 1992; 24(6):327-9. PubMed ID: 1443674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of measurements of human sperm motility characteristics by the automated CellSoft system and time-exposure photomicrography.
    Chan SY; Zhang GH; Lo T; Leung A; Wang C
    Int J Androl; 1991 Jun; 14(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 2066160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between a conventional index of progressive sperm motility and movement variables analysed by CellSoft.
    Rosenborg L; Rogberg L; Fredricsson B
    Andrologia; 1991; 23(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 1897751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn Motility Analyzer for routine semen analysis.
    Sukcharoen N; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Apr; 78(4):182-90. PubMed ID: 7673804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized semen analysis with sperm tail detection.
    Neuwinger J; Behre HM; Nieschlag E
    Hum Reprod; 1990 Aug; 5(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 2254406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of motility of ejaculated, liquid-stored boar spermatozoa using computerized instruments.
    Tejerina F; Buranaamnuay K; Saravia F; Wallgren M; Rodriguez-Martinez H
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jun; 69(9):1129-38. PubMed ID: 18358522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
    Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of manual microscopic and computer-assisted methods for analysis of sperm count and motility.
    Centola GM
    Arch Androl; 1996; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8824662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser.
    Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
    Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.