These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8280978)

  • 1. Statistical description of microcirculatory flow as measured with an MR method.
    Su MY; Nalcioglu O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(6):883-7. PubMed ID: 8280978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voxel sensitivity function description of flow-induced signal loss in MR imaging: implications for black-blood MR angiography with turbo spin-echo sequences.
    Jara H; Yu BC; Caruthers SD; Melhem ER; Yucel EK
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Mar; 41(3):575-90. PubMed ID: 10204883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general model of microcirculatory blood flow effects in gradient sensitized MRI.
    Kennan RP; Gao JH; Zhong J; Gore JC
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8058020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].
    Wacker CM; Bauer WR
    Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 12669220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Susceptibility effects in porous media in the presence of flow.
    Su MY; Nalcioglu O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 8400567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flow effects in multislice, spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Model, experimental verification, and clinical examples.
    Williams DM; Meyer CR; Schreiner RJ
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Aug; 22(8):642-50. PubMed ID: 3667171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative measurement of high flow velocities by a spin echo MR technique.
    Yi-gun L; Kojima A; Shinzato J; Sakamoto Y; Ueno S; Takahashi M; Higashida Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):217-22. PubMed ID: 1823395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative study of flow dependence in NMR images at low flow velocities.
    Ståhlberg F; Nordell B; Ericsson A; Greitz T; Persson B; Sperber G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1986; 10(6):1006-15. PubMed ID: 3782539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of flow velocities from magnetic resonance multiple spin-echo images. A phantom study.
    Ståhlberg F; Henriksen O; Thomsen C; Stubgaard M; Persson B
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 2960363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A rotating phantom for the study of flow effects in MR imaging.
    Nordell B; Ståhlberg F; Ericsson A; Ranta C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 2850436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the design of a capillary flow phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents at very low flow velocities.
    Veltmann C; Lohmaier S; Schlosser T; Shai S; Ehlgen A; Pohl C; Becher H; Tiemann K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 May; 28(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12079699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orientation dependence of microcirculation-induced diffusion signal in anisotropic tissues.
    Abdullah OM; Gomez AD; Merchant S; Heidinger M; Poelzing S; Hsu EW
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1252-62. PubMed ID: 26511215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Microcirculatory Flow on Oscillating Gradient Diffusion MRI and Diffusion Encoding with Dual-Frequency Orthogonal Gradients (DEFOG).
    Wu D; Zhang J
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Apr; 77(4):1583-1592. PubMed ID: 27080566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI signal loss due to microcirculation: phantom studies.
    Duewell S; Wüthrich R; Buck A; von Weymarn C; von Schulthess GK
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 May; 14(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 2345514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR imaging of poststenotic flow phenomena: experimental studies.
    Krug B; Kugel H; Friedmann G; Bunke J; van Dijk P; Schmidt R; Hirche HJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 1790384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Poststenotic flow in MRT: phantom measurements using spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences].
    Spielmann RP; Thiele F; Heller M; Bücheler E
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1989 Jun; 9(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 2752673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A complex-difference phase-contrast technique for measurement of volume flow rates.
    Polzin JA; Alley MT; Korosec FR; Grist TM; Wang Y; Mistretta CA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 7766973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximization of contrast-to-noise ratio to distinguish diffusion and microcirculatory flow.
    Maki JH; Benveniste H; MacFall JR; Johnson GA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 1802129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-plane flow velocity quantification along the phase encoding axis in MRI.
    Duerk JL; Pattany PM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 3398740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of venous and arterial flow by a selective saturation-recovery spin echo (SSRSE) method.
    Wehrli FW; Shimakawa A; MacFall JR; Axel L; Perman W
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(3):537-45. PubMed ID: 3989053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.